Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Bikram Bhattacharjee v. M/S Singer India Ltd.

31 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4654
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of a review petition, holding that Labour Courts lack jurisdiction to review awards on merits absent procedural error, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the same.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court Review petition Jurisdiction

Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors. v. Interdigital Technology Corp. & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4547-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a consent order under Order XXXIX CPC cannot be modified without parties' consent and set aside directions rejecting Indian bank guarantees and ordering deposit of amounts, emphasizing strict construction of bank guarantees and maintainability of appeals under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Standard Essential Patents Bank Guarantee Consent Order Order XXXIX CPC

Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India

31 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4681-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the suspension of Defsys Solutions' business dealings by the Ministry of Defence for lack of natural justice and held that suspension cannot be based solely on an ongoing investigation without charge sheet or formal accusation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant MOD Guidelines suspension of business dealings natural justice show cause notice

Gautam Guha v. MTNL

31 May 2024 · Prateek Jalan

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award on damages for undelivered goods manufactured specifically for MTNL, set aside the award on storage charges for lack of evidence, and dismissed other challenges, clarifying principles on mitigation, specific performance, and evidentiary support in arbitration.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Mitigation of damages Specific performance

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Kasturi Lal Gupta & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4537

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by recalculating the deceased's income and future prospects, applying the correct multiplier, and directing appropriate apportionment among claimants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation motor accident claim future prospects

K S Dhingra v. Union of India and Ors.

31 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4562-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the downward revision of pension based on foreign service rules but barred recovery of excess pension payments made over five years prior to the recovery order to a retired employee.

administrative petition_allowed Significant CCS Pension Rules foreign service pension fixation excess pension recovery

Asha Srivastava v. Arun Srivastava & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4730

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will excluding daughters from inheritance, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for partition of her deceased mother's properties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will validity Testamentary capacity Indian Succession Act Indian Evidence Act

Delhi Jal Board & Anr v. Chandra Kala & Ors

31 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4538

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the Delhi Jal Board tanker driver liable for rash and negligent driving causing fatal injuries, dismissing the appeal challenging compensation.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rash and negligent driving compensation motor accident claim

Harsimran Singh v. Ravinder Kaur Pasricha

31 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4668-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal setting aside the Family Court's closure of evidence order, permitting payment of costs and leading evidence to decide the matter on merits.

family appeal_allowed Family Court Affidavit of evidence Closure of evidence Costs payment

Dr. Kusuma Praveen Kumar v. Delhi Pharmaceutical Science and Research University

31 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4625

The Delhi High Court directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner’s reply to the show cause notice holistically and grant a personal hearing, providing protection for 10 days post-order to enable grievance redressal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ petition show cause notice personal hearing service norms

Ascon Dairy Pvt Ltd v. State Bank of India and Ors.

31 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4714

The Delhi High Court held that all documents relied upon in a Show Cause Notice must be disclosed to the affected party to ensure fair opportunity to reply, and directed SBI to furnish the complete underlying reports to the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice Disclosure of documents Right to representation

Dinesh Sharma v. Shri Mahender Chawla & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4680
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that compliance with court directions to upgrade ACRs and hold a Review DPC precludes contempt proceedings challenging the DPC's constitution or outcome, which must be contested through appropriate legal remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Annual Confidential Report Review DPC Contempt proceedings

Meghana T. V. v. Union of India

31 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4566
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arising wholly in Karnataka precludes exercise of jurisdiction by the Delhi High Court under Article 226.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 territorial jurisdiction cause of action High Court jurisdiction

InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:4610

The Delhi High Court ordered mutual disclosure of Qualcomm license agreements under confidentiality to assess patent exhaustion and FRAND issues in SEP infringement suits between InterDigital and Oppo.

civil other Significant Standard Essential Patents Patent Infringement Patent Exhaustion FRAND Royalties

Tripurari Kumar Jha v. Faculty of Law, University of Delhi & Anr.

31 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4564-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the University has the power to readmit first-term LLB students detained for attendance shortage due to genuine medical reasons, directing readmission without fresh entrance examination.

academic/administrative appeal_allowed Significant readmission attendance shortage Ordinance IV Article 5(b) Ordinance V Appendix II

Dr Chayan Jain & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

31 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4565-DB

The Delhi High Court held that absence of an official seal on sponsorship certificates is not a mandatory ground for rejecting AFMS postgraduate medical admissions and directed admission of meritorious candidates in the next academic year.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant AFMS postgraduate admission sponsorship certificate official seal NEET PG

Jindal Industries Private Limited v. Jindal Sanitaryware Private Limited & Anr.

31 May 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:4609

The Delhi High Court set aside an ad interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'JINDAL' on PVC pipes, holding defendants had prior user rights and a lawful right to use their family name under Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Prior user rights Section 35 Trade Marks Act Use of own name as trademark

Jindal Industries Private Limited v. Jindal Sanitaryware Private Limited & Anr.

31 May 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:4609

The Delhi High Court set aside an ad interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'JINDAL' on PVC pipes, holding that bona fide prior use of a common surname as a trademark is protected under Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Prior user Section 35 Trade Marks Act Common surname as trademark

Rohit v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

31 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:4530
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, balancing statutory bail restrictions with fundamental rights due to serious doubts on evidence and prolonged pre-trial incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail default bail

Mahant Shri Naga Baba Bhola Giri v. District Magistrate District Central and Ors

31 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4560

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking demarcation and protection of a shrine on government land in the Yamuna floodplain, holding that possession does not confer title and ecological restoration mandates removal of encroachments.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 demarcation government land Yamuna river floodplain