Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Ghulam Mohd. Bhat v. National Investigating Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under the UA(P) Act, holding that reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations are prima facie true, thus bail is not warranted under Section 43D(5).
Ethos Limited v. Geofin Investments Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on damages for unauthorized occupation, holding that applications under Section 34(4) to resume proceedings are not maintainable at the appellate stage and that the Arbitrator's factual findings are final unless perverse.
Ashish Gaurav v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, relying on its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Gajender & Ors. v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Akshay Sarin v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent jurisdiction.
Jaiprakash & Anr v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their criminal revision petition unconditionally and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Niimal Singh Lamba v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking directions for investigation and FIR registration after closure reports were filed, directing petitioners to pursue alternate remedies under criminal law.
Neeraj Kumar Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw his bail applications and dismissed them as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek bail from the Trial Court after charge sheet filing.
M Rajamannar v. Vice Chancellor IGNOU and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that IGNOU’s Board of Management’s approval of retrospective promotion cannot be overturned based on non-binding comments from the Ministry of HRD, granting the petitioner promotion from 06.03.2005 with all consequential benefits.
Sudhir Kumar Mehrotra v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a bank officer compulsorily retired in public interest is entitled to pension benefits under the relevant circular and service regulations, directing the bank to release pension and arrears after the petitioner deposited the requisite amount.
D.R. Vadera & Sons (HUF) v. Sita Nanda
The Delhi High Court declared the plaintiff as the absolute owner of Unit-C, 20-C, Prithviraj Road, based on a valid 1971 co-lessee deed and payment of consideration, notwithstanding a subsequent conveyance deed in favor of the defendant.
Pushpa Vadera v. Mrs. Sita Nanda
The Delhi High Court declared the Plaintiff as the absolute owner of Unit-E, 20-E Prithviraj Road, based on a valid co-lessee deed and payment of conversion charges, notwithstanding a subsequent conveyance deed in favor of the Defendant.
Wholesale Trading Services P Ltd. v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to entertain a delayed complaint against a Chartered Accountant under Rule 12 of the ICAI disciplinary rules, dismissing the petition as frivolous with costs.
M/S HOTEL MARINA & ANR. v. VIBHA MEHTA
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory observations in an adjournment order do not bind parties or prejudice rights in a pending execution petition and dismissed the appeal as not maintainable.
Sahil Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Mukesh Kumar v. Jai Bhagwan Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove rash and negligent driving by the offending vehicle under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Moti Lal Daga and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of tenders for Independence and Republic Day celebrations, holding that the successful bidders complied with tender conditions and no illegality was established.
Rajesh Kumar v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 307, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties settled and the complainant withdrew grievances.
Anish Gupta & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh. Kamal Hasan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.