Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Rakesh Passi & Anr. v. Hawa Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced contributory negligence from 50% to 35% in a motor accident claim involving sudden stoppage of a truck, ordered recalculation of compensation with correct multiplier and loss of future prospects, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Dolly & Ors. v. National Insurance Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance motor accident compensation by applying minimum wages for a matriculate, adding 40% for future prospects, and awarding amounts for loss of consortium and love and affection.
Facebook Inc v. Surinder Malik
The Delhi High Court held that Facebook and Instagram, as intermediaries under Section 79 IT Act, are not required to appear personally in trademark infringement suits if they comply with takedown obligations upon notification.
Vinay Kumar Jain v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
Delhi High Court granted bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights and parity with co-accused.
Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Union of India, SFIO
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, emphasizing compliance with auditing standards, absence of specific fraud allegations, and parity with co-accused granted bail.
Ashok Kumar Makhija v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court granted bail to retired bank officers accused of economic offences under the Companies Act, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights and prior bail grants to co-accused.
Sandeep Sirohi v. GNCTD
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner possessed a valid OBC certificate under GNCTD policy and was entitled to OBC reservation benefits, setting aside the Tribunal’s rejection of his candidature.
Commissioner of Customs v. Himanshu Gupta
The Delhi High Court set aside CESTAT remand orders based on a stayed Supreme Court decision and directed fresh disposal of customs appeals uninfluenced by that decision.
Commissioner of Customs v. Bimal Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court allowed the Commissioner of Customs' appeals, quashing CESTAT remand orders influenced by a stayed Coordinate Bench decision, and directed fresh disposal of appeals uninfluenced by the stayed judgment.
Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Metal and Ferro Alloys Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that CESTAT must decide appeals on merits including jurisdiction issues without being influenced by a stayed High Court judgment, setting aside the remand order to the original adjudicating authority.
Commissioner of Customs v. Manoj Shah
The Delhi High Court allowed the Commissioner of Customs' appeal, quashing CESTAT's remand orders and directing fresh adjudication uninfluenced by a stayed Supreme Court judgment.
Commissioner of Customs v. Neerumarketing Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside CESTAT orders remanding customs appeals based on a stayed Coordinate Bench decision and directed fresh disposal on merits uninfluenced by the stayed judgment.
Land & Building Dept, GNCTD v. Kasturi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of the Land & Building Department, upholding the Single Judge's order permitting the respondent to submit additional documents and directing consideration of her application for alternate land allotment under the 1961 policy.
M/S SEASONS FURNISHINGS LTD. v. ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER REGIONAL OFFICE DELHI EAST AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against an EPF assessment order due to non-service of the order at the correct address, directing the Tribunal to hear the appeal on merits despite the expiry of limitation.
Narender Kumar Popli v. Sadan Batra
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement subject to costs, enabling the petitioner to defend the suit and setting aside the order closing the right to defend.
Man Mohan @ Mastoo Ram v. Ravinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that tenants are entitled to leave to defend eviction petitions where they disclose facts challenging the landlord's bona fide necessity, setting aside eviction orders and remanding for trial.
Man Mohan @ Mastoo Ram v. Ravinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that tenants disclosing facts negating the landlord's bona fide requirement must be granted leave to defend eviction petitions, setting aside earlier orders rejecting such leave.
Man Mohan @ Mastoo Ram v. Ravinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that tenants are entitled to leave to defend eviction petitions where they disclose facts challenging the landlord's bona fide necessity, setting aside eviction orders that denied such leave.
Imran v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 138 NI Act and acquitted the petitioner after he paid the cheque amount to the complainant, also waiving legal costs due to his poor financial condition.
Arshad Ali v. The State
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition directing the trial court to permit the accused to recall and cross-examine a key eyewitness on material aspects to ensure a fair trial.