Delhi High Court

44,251 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. M/S. Navayuga Engineering Co. Ltd. & Anr.

31 Oct 2014 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:6492

The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond the 120-day period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, and administrative delay does not constitute sufficient cause for such condonation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(3) condonation of delay limitation period

SPML INFRA LIMITED v. GRAPHITE INDIA LIMITED

31 Oct 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:1074

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award due to failure to show sufficient cause for delay beyond the strict limitation period and held that fundamental filing defects render the petition invalid to stop limitation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 34(3) Arbitration and Conciliation Act limitation period sufficient cause

Jiwan Ram v. Union of India

14 Oct 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8096-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court directed grant of one notional increment for pension calculation to a retired government employee, subject to the outcome of a pending Supreme Court Review Petition.

administrative petition_allowed Significant notional increment pension calculation retirement benefits Department of Personnel & Training

PNB Housing Finance Ltd v. Ms. Pinky Aggarwal & Ors.

26 Sep 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6990
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon finding a valid arbitration agreement and timely petition, directing disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 21 notice arbitration agreement

Bhim Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

19 Sep 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8114-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant formally appointed to hold charge of a higher post outside his cadre is entitled to the pay of that post under FR 49(iii), quashing the Tribunal’s dismissal of the petitioner’s claim for pay difference as Store Keeper.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Fundamental Rule 49(iii) Store Keeper look-after charge pay entitlement

Ravinder Kumar v. Govt. of NCT Delhi

08 Sep 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9122-DB

Recovery of alleged excess pay from a Group-C employee retiring within one year is impermissible without prior undertaking, quashing the recovery order under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

administrative petition_allowed Significant excess payment recovery Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Group-C employees

The Chief Executive Officer J and K Era Srinagar Kashmir v. Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd

01 Sep 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5880

The Delhi High Court held that arbitration seated in Delhi is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 notwithstanding the contract's governing law being Jammu and Kashmir law, and dismissed the petitioner's challenge based on the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant seat of arbitration curial law governing law Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration Act, 1997

Union of India and Ors. v. Ravi Shankar Kumar Sinha

26 Aug 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1244
Cites 3 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a dismissal order where the disciplinary authority's disagreement note was conclusive rather than tentative and critical evidence was not properly proved, emphasizing adherence to natural justice in departmental proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disagreement note departmental inquiry natural justice proof of documents

K.L. Enterprises LLP & Ors. v. Bajaj Finance Limited

21 Aug 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:2227

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining the sale of pledged shares by the lender during the Covid-19 pandemic, balancing contractual rights with regulatory moratoriums and pandemic-induced hardships pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Loan-cum-Pledge Agreement Covid-19 pandemic

National Highways Authority of India v. Yedeshi Aurangabad Tollway Limited

05 Aug 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:424
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court held that stay of an arbitral money award requires 100% deposit or security as per amended Section 36(3) and CPC principles, dismissing NHAI's stay application against a ₹1503 crore award in favor of Yedeshi.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 36(3) Arbitration and Conciliation Act Stay of Execution Money Decree

Delhi Diocesan Trust Association v. Edwin William & Anr

22 Jul 2014 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7111

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's orders dismissing the petitioner's claim of fraudulent suit withdrawal, holding that the power of attorney was not legally revoked and no prima facie fraud was established.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant power of attorney revocation withdrawal of suit Section 115 CPC

Ahmed Sikander v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Jul 2014 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1728

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole for a life convict who had previously violated parole conditions and was involved in further crimes, holding that parole rejection was justified and lawful.

criminal petition_dismissed parole life imprisonment violation of parole Delhi Prisons Rules 2018

SMS Limited v. Oil & Natural Gas Limited

02 Jul 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:116

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees are invocable on demand and refused to grant pre-arbitral injunction restraining ONGC from invoking bank guarantees furnished by SMS for liquidated damages.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bank guarantee unconditional bank guarantee liquidated damages pre-arbitral injunction

M/S Mukti Credits Pvt. Ltd. v. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd.

30 Jun 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 113

The Delhi High Court restrained the respondent from encashing the bank guarantee pending final adjudication of arbitral award objections, directing its return to the petitioner as the net amount payable was in the petitioner’s favor.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition bank guarantee security deposit

Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited v. UEM India Private Limited

19 Jun 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2023:DHC:1644

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the existence of an arbitration agreement prima facie requires arbitration, leaving jurisdictional disputes for the arbitrator to decide.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition arbitration agreement Memorandum of Understanding

Ritika Prasad v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

06 Jun 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1927
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the university to issue educational degrees reflecting both parents' names, affirming gender equality and compliance with the UGC circular mandating inclusion of mothers' names on academic certificates.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant gender equality educational certificates parents' names University Grants Commission circular

Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Shonkh Technologies International Ltd.

25 Apr 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9092
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the Consortium Agreement for smart card vehicle registrations was valid till 2017, termination without a proper cure notice was invalid, and awarded damages to the respondents for unlawful termination.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Consortium Agreement Efflux of time Material breach

Prof. Ajay Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

17 Apr 2014 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2022:DHC:3447
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging sexual harassment, holding that the FIR discloses cognizable offences and investigation must proceed, emphasizing judicial restraint in interfering with ongoing criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR sexual harassment Internal Complaints Committee

Dr. Bina Modi v. Lalit Kumar Modi & Ors.

09 Apr 2014 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:3730-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the maintainability of suits seeking injunction against ICC arbitration under a family trust deed, holding that anti-arbitration injunction suits are not maintainable and the arbitration clause is valid and enforceable under Indian law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement anti-arbitration injunction Indian Trusts Act arbitrability

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Union of India and Anr

25 Mar 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8003-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order directing MTNL to grant out of turn promotion to a sportsperson employee based on his medal-winning achievements, rejecting the employer’s arbitrary denial.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant out of turn promotion increment medal-winning performance Recruitment Rules