Delhi High Court
44,251 judgments
P.D.R SOLUTIONS FZC v. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL- 2, NEW DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the DRP's directions for failure to consider treaty-based objections, holding that non-application of mind by the DRP amounts to jurisdictional error amenable to writ jurisdiction despite alternative remedies.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Azmati Khatoon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing the addition for loss of future prospects to 40%, limiting compensation amounts for loss of love and affection and consortium as per Supreme Court guidelines, and reducing interest rate to 9% in a motor accident claim.
Prabhu Dayal Gora & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the limitation of cadre change vacancies from ancillary staff to Constable (Executive) to 22, holding that transfers do not create fresh vacancies and the selection process was lawful.
Sh. Umar Farooque & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of Patient Care Allowance to pharmacists at Army Ordnance Corps dispensaries, holding they do not meet the eligibility criteria as their duties lack direct patient care in recognized health care institutions.
M/S ANKUSH DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD. v. M/S PARY DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between real estate developers, directing compliance with procedural safeguards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Manju & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim by substituting the deceased's income with minimum wages and applying Supreme Court precedents on loss of future prospects and nonpecuniary damages.
Gaurav Panwar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Santosh Kumar Singh v. Deepak Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that where a decree has been satisfied before the executing Court, any amount deposited pursuant to a stay order in appellate proceedings must be refunded to the appellant.
Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd v. Rites Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-disclosure of an amicable settlement in tender documents constitutes material concealment justifying dismissal of the writ petition and upheld the tender award while allowing the petitioner to be heard before forfeiture of earnest money.
Gaurav Miglani et al. v. Imagine Marketing Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction against Exotic Mile's use of marks deceptively similar to Imagine Marketing's 'boAt' trademarks but set aside the injunction against an unprayed-for tagline, allowing use of a new mark 'GOBOULT' pending separate challenge.
Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement orders under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS Pension Rules against two municipal officers, affirming limited judicial interference in administrative decisions based on doubtful integrity and public interest.
Sopariwala Exports & Ors. v. Akhil Kumar Kachhara Trading as Ali Impex & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages for trademark infringement, permitted destruction of seized infringing goods, and ordered release of bank guarantee upon compliance.
The Indian School v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the respondents to adjudicate a show cause notice but restrained enforcement of any adverse order against the petitioner pending further orders, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Amour Banquets Private Limited v. Oyo Hotels and Homes Private Limited and Another
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to refer disputes arising from a Management Services Agreement to arbitration, leaving limitation and other issues to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
Inter University Accelerator Centre v. Manisha Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the promotion of an eligible employee to Personal Assistant with retrospective effect, rejecting the promotion of a non-feeder cadre employee and affirming strict adherence to Recruitment Rules.
DAV Model School v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court upheld that a litigant is bound by unchallenged concessions made before the Court and directed the appellant school to pay the respondent her MACP benefits with interest.
Vinay Kumar Jain v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
Delhi High Court granted bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights and parity with co-accused.
Ghanshyam Das Gupta v. Union of India, SFIO
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a statutory auditor accused under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, emphasizing compliance with auditing standards, absence of specific fraud allegations, and parity with co-accused granted bail.
Ashok Kumar Makhija v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court granted bail to retired bank officers accused of economic offences under the Companies Act, balancing statutory bail restrictions with constitutional rights and prior bail grants to co-accused.
Sandeep Sirohi v. GNCTD
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner possessed a valid OBC certificate under GNCTD policy and was entitled to OBC reservation benefits, setting aside the Tribunal’s rejection of his candidature.