Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Sh Devendra Singh Bisht v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7496

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Rajpal Bable & Ors. v. The State NCT Delhi & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7490

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under multiple IPC sections based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Meena Rana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7527

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against a Vacation Notice issued by MCD, restraining coercive action until the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is heard, due to the tribunal's administrative vacancy.

administrative petition_allowed Vacation Notice Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal MCD interim protection

Rajinder Kumar Jain v. The State

29 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7516

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating by concealing a court stay order in property sale, given serious allegations, evasive conduct, and ongoing investigation requiring custodial interrogation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 420 IPC cheating concealment of court order

Sports Authority of India v. Parul Tyagi

29 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7634-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim stay on a transfer order by the CAT as infructuous after the employee's contract expired, leaving the substantive dispute to the Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal interim order transfer and relieving order contract expiry

Kiran Sonkusale v. Centre for Railway Information Systems

29 Aug 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:7485
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an employee who resigns without completing mandatory probation post-promotion is not entitled to retrospective promotion despite delay in promotion proceedings caused by the pandemic.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant promotion Departmental Promotion Committee probation period resignation

Ankush Kumar Parashar v. Sapna @ Mona & Master Madhav

29 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:7489

The Delhi High Court modified a maintenance order reducing the monthly amount payable by the husband after finding the wife did not desert without cause and balancing the financial capacities of both parties.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance under Section 125 CrPC desertion without reasonable cause quantum of maintenance financial capacity

Yogesh Mittal v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:7493
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the revision order setting aside the Trial Court's discharge of accused directors in a cheating and forgery case, directing framing of charges based on prima facie evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing prima facie case discharge order forgery

Sh Shahbaz Ahmad & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7494

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute and the complainant's unwillingness to continue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise

Hari Saran @ Hariom v. The State NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7486

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in burglary and firing at police, emphasizing the gravity of offences and violent antecedents over pendency of trial or co-accused's bail.

criminal bail_denied bail application burglary firing at police violent antecedents

Altaf v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7502

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR under the POCSO Act, holding that compromise by the parents of a minor victim does not warrant quashing criminal proceedings against a proclaimed offender.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR POCSO Act minor victim compromise

Abdul Malik alias Parvez v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7495

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that possession of small quantity ganja is bailable and mere circumstantial evidence is insufficient to deny bail in conspiracy charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail small quantity ganja conspiracy

M/S SNNR PVT LTD v. M/S SHELLZ INDIA PVT LTD

29 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7510

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final opportunity to cross-examine a witness despite delay, imposing costs to compensate the respondent.

civil petition_allowed cross-examination opportunity delay costs

Arya Orphanage v. Mukti Dutta & Ors.

29 Aug 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7459-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the application to reject the plaint and allowed transposition of a party, holding that mutation does not confer title and probate proceedings do not bar civil suits challenging ownership.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mutation probate Will Hindu Succession Act 1956

M/s KNR Tirumala Infra Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India

29 Aug 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:7488
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that parties agreeing to institutional arbitration under SAROD must appoint arbitrators from SAROD's broad-based panel, dismissing the petitioner's attempt to nominate an arbitrator outside the panel.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Institutional arbitration SAROD Arbitration Rules

Ashok Babu v. State Government of NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri

The High Court acquitted appellants for lack of evidence of common intention and participation under Section 34 IPC in causing grievous hurt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention grievous hurt voluntarily causing hurt

M/S MRK Infra v. Sales Tax Officer/Class II (STO), DGST, Ward-94, Zone-8 & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7569-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without hearing the petitioner, directing fresh adjudication after allowing the petitioner to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice

CJ Infrastructure Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal for NCT of Delhi & UT Chandigarh & Ors.

29 Aug 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7476-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of RERA Act for promoters' appeals and rejected the claim of deemed grant of Occupancy Certificate, dismissing the appeals for non-compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 Section 43(5) Occupancy-cum-Completion Certificate Pre-deposit

M N Corporation v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7577-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without affording the petitioner a proper hearing due to portal notice issues and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the extension notification open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A CGST Act

Savita Jain & Ors. v. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

29 Aug 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7517

The court declined to decide ownership disputes in writ petitions concerning illegal construction, directing removal of unauthorized construction subject to final civil suit adjudication on title.

property other ownership dispute possession regularization of construction building plan sanction