Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Roger Shashoua & Ors. v. Mukesh Sharma & Ors.

01 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:7560
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement and enforced two foreign arbitral awards directing share transfers under a shareholders agreement, rejecting respondents' jurisdictional and enforcement objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 foreign arbitral award enforcement shareholders agreement

Pratap Venugopal v. CRB Capital Markets Ltd

01 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2025:DHC:7584

The Delhi High Court directed the Special Committee to transfer funds to the Court and allowed SEBI to complete the winding up of the Arihant Mangal Growth Scheme, emphasizing equitable treatment of unit holders and prohibiting unauthorized payments to ex-management.

administrative other Significant SEBI Arihant Mangal Growth Scheme Special Committee Mutual Fund Regulations

Vinod v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

01 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7605

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, 354D, 509, 506, and 323 IPC on the ground of compromise and changed circumstances, exercising its power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise Section 482 CrPC IPC Sections 354, 354A, 354D, 509, 506, 323

Mintu @ Milan Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi

01 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7603

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 341, 354D, and 506 IPC based on compromise between parties and petitioner’s reformed conduct.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise Section 341 IPC Section 354D IPC

Harmandeep Singh & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.

01 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7581

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 338, and 34 IPC after the injured party received compensation and chose not to pursue prosecution, holding that quashing was in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise in criminal case Section 288 IPC Section 338 IPC

GL Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

01 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:7609

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to an inordinate and unexplained delay of 19 months in pronouncement, holding such delay violates public policy and fundamental justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Delay in pronouncement Section 34 Arbitration Act Public policy

Ravi Singh Sandhu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

01 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7557

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in a serious economic offence case involving alleged fraud, forged documents, and dishonoured cheques, holding that contractual documents do not shield criminal liability where dishonest intent exists from inception.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail economic offences cheating forgery

M/S M I TEXTILES PTE LTD. v. M/S T T LTD. & ANR.

01 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7567

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree holding the appellant liable for payment under an irrevocable Letter of Credit, ruling that time was not the essence of the contract and discrepancies raised were insufficient to justify rejection of shipping documents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Letter of Credit UCPDC Publication No. 500 time essence of contract shipping documents discrepancies

Trans Image Corporation v. M/S G3 Info Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr

01 Sep 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7695

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's suo motu direction to produce entire email correspondence under Section 168 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, dismissing the petition challenging the order.

civil petition_dismissed Section 168 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 production of documents trial court powers email evidence

Nisha Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7626

The Delhi High Court granted limited temporary de-sealing of premises to remove goods due to non-functionality of the statutory appellate tribunal, without deciding the merits of the sealing order.

administrative petition_allowed Sealing Order Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Appellate Tribunal MCD temporary de-sealing

Ajay Kumar Nayyar v. State of NCT of Delhi

01 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7583

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Ajay Kumar Nayyar in a cheating case involving forged documents and serious charges, citing the gravity of offences, antecedents, and trial delays.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail cheating Section 420 IPC Section 419 IPC

Deepak Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7582

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a robbery case applying the principle of parity with co-accused and considering identification and recovery circumstances.

criminal bail_granted bail parity Test Identification Parade recovery of stolen property

Yashraj Tiwari v. Union of India

30 Aug 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:7665

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking inclusion in the NRI quota for NEET-UG 2025 counseling due to failure to submit mandatory embassy-endorsed affidavit and NRI certificate within the prescribed timeline, affirming uniform application of eligibility criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed NRI quota NEET-UG counseling embassy-endorsed affidavit NRI certificate

Amit Wadhwa & Ors. v. State (Govt. of N.C.T.) of Delhi & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7295

The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting the Police Station name from Shahdara to Jagatpuri in a prior judgment to rectify a typographical error.

criminal other Procedural typographical error corrigendum Police Station name correction judgment correction

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. National Petroleum Construction Company

29 Aug 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7491-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that the assessee does not have a Permanent Establishment in India for AYs 2018-21, following consistent earlier decisions under the India-UAE DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Income Tax Act 1961 Section 260A India-UAE DTAA

Pramod Goel v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

29 Aug 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:8301

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing revision but upheld the summoning order under Sections 138 and 141 NI Act, holding that liability and procedural issues require trial-level evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Section 397 CrPC

Pooja Rasne v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Aug 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:8114

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the husband's sister for lack of specific allegations, emphasizing the need to prevent misuse of Section 498A IPC through omnibus accusations in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC domestic violence matrimonial cruelty quashing of FIR

Kapoor Sons and Co v. M/S Sycorian Matrimonial Services Ltd

29 Aug 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8093

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that disputed factual questions regarding the plaintiff's legal status and limitation require trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC locus standi partnership firm proprietorship concern

Usha Sharma and Another v. Swati Sharma

29 Aug 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:8047

The High Court quashed a belated revisional order reinstating aged parents as parties in domestic violence proceedings, holding that revision was barred due to an available statutory appeal and that principles of natural justice were violated.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29 DV Act Section 397 Cr.P.C. Section 401 Cr.P.C.

Sudesh Kumar Deceased Through His Legal Representative Sh Parth v. Sarabjit Singh Anand & Ors.

29 Aug 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:7667

The High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal directing the trial court to permit further pre-charge evidence despite previous adjournments, emphasizing the right to a fair trial and balancing it against delay concerns.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant right to fair trial Article 21 pre-charge evidence adjournment