Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Suparn Pandey v. Gayatri Dahiya
The Delhi High Court held that only the court seized of the original sexual harassment complaint can restrain media reporting of the complaint and related proceedings, and a plaintiff cannot seek injunction against media reporting of the suit itself or related legal proceedings in a separate suit.
Khalid Kamal Alvi v. Vijay Kumar Sachdev & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the eviction revision petition on an undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Hansraj v. Vinod Choudhary
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition and upheld the eviction order on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, finding no triable issue or alternative accommodation available.
M/S Telecon India v. Railway Board
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging tender eligibility criteria by directing the Railway Board to consider the petitioners' representation without adjudicating on the merits.
Divya Kumra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL alleging forcible insertion of contraceptive devices without consent, holding that disputed factual issues must be resolved by the competent forum.
VKA ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to decide the petitioner's DVAT refund claim with interest expeditiously and in accordance with law.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ram Kumar Goyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a 50% deduction towards personal expenses is appropriate for a deceased bachelor in motor accident claims and fixed loss of future prospects at 40%, enhancing compensation to the parents accordingly.
Renu & Ors. v. IFFCO Tokio Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to grant non-pecuniary compensation for loss of consortium and love and affection to claimants in a motor accident claim, following Supreme Court precedent.
Omwati v. Satish Kumar & Anr
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a long-pending complaint due to the complainant's lack of seriousness and inordinate delay causing prejudice to respondents.
Sh. Manish Kumar Mathur & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties reached an amicable settlement and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Brightpoint India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a Revision Application cannot be dismissed solely for non-payment of court fee at filing if the fee is paid promptly after defect is pointed out, and directed the Revisional Authority to decide the matter on merits.
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. RAJNI YADAV & ORS
The Delhi High Court modified the compensation award in a motor accident claim by excluding personal allowances from salary computation and adjusting non-pecuniary damages and interest as per Supreme Court guidelines.
Sangeeta v. Neetu
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for injunction arising out of a marital relationship falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court and ordered transfer of the suit accordingly.
Subhash Chand v. Taruna Rani
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, allowing withdrawal subject to the petitioner’s undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Shesh Kumar v. Taruna Rani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, allowing withdrawal subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, with execution of eviction stayed accordingly.
Mahender Behl v. Taruna Rani
The Delhi High Court stayed the eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Ved Prakash v. Taruna Rani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, accepting the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and stay execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Shehzad Ali v. Taruna Rani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, allowing withdrawal on the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Tanvir Hassan Zaidi v. Nishat Hannan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on bona fide necessity grounds under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming that co-owners can seek eviction and tenants cannot resist eviction on behalf of third parties.
Pratap Singh & Ors v. Niranjan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, allowing withdrawal subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.