Delhi High Court

48,936 judgments

Year:

S B Hospital & Healthcare (P) Ltd. v. Managing Trustee Sant Parmanand Blind Relief Mission

08 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5865

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the consent of the parties.

other petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral proceedings

ISGEC HEAVY ENGINEERING LIMITED v. BHUSHAN ENERGY LIMITED

08 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5852

The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration Act, considering insolvency proceedings and financial constraints of the respondent.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(5) extension of time arbitral proceedings

Chandan Shah v. The State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr

08 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5854

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 452, and 506 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's non-objection.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC Section 354 IPC

Rajender Kumar & Ors v. State (N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr

08 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5853

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's non-objection.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC criminal proceedings

Nikhil Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr.

08 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5855

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute criminal proceedings

Manuvel Mezhukanal v. State & Anr.

08 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5856

The Delhi High Court quashed a 2015 FIR under Section 420 IPC on the petitioner’s undertaking to pay ₹5 lakhs to welfare institutions, balancing public interest with the accused’s financial status.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC proclaimed offender cost imposition

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd & Ors. v. Vipin Kumar

08 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5857-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed HPCL's appeal setting aside the Single Judge's direction to promote an employee, holding that non-communication of a downgraded APAR is remedied by opportunity to represent and courts cannot direct promotion but only reconsideration.

labor appeal_allowed Significant APAR communication promotion downgraded ACR judicial review

M/S Kolmet Enterprises and Anr. v. New Delhi Municipal Council

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5858

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging electricity arrears and misuse charges, holding that the petitioner must deposit 50% of the disputed amount under Section 127(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 before the appeal can be entertained.

administrative petition_dismissed Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126 Section 127(2) misuse charges

Madan Lal & Anr. v. Suman Jain

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5859

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to an eviction order under bona fide necessity but stayed execution until March 2021 subject to the petitioners' undertakings.

property appeal_dismissed eviction bona fide necessity Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Raj Kumar Pahwa v. Suman Jain

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5860

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, allowing withdrawal subject to undertakings and stayed execution of eviction till possession is handed over.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bona fide necessity

BHU DUTT SHARMA v. SUMAN JAIN

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5861

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition as withdrawn and stayed eviction execution until 31.03.2021 on the tenant’s undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bonafide necessity

Amit Dawar v. Suman Jain

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5862

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bonafide necessity grounds but stayed execution until the tenant vacates the premises by a specified date upon furnishing undertakings.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bonafide necessity

Kunwar Pal Singh v. Richpal Singh

08 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5863

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction but stayed execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant’s undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.

property appeal_dismissed eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide necessity

Subhash Agarwal v. Abhishek Andley & Ors.

08 Nov 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:5864

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution court's order directing civil imprisonment of a judgment debtor who has the capacity but refuses to pay a money decree, clarifying that insolvency petitions do not automatically stay execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant civil imprisonment execution proceedings capacity to pay Section 51 CPC

Shingying Kristy v. Delhi University through Vice Chancellor and Ors.

08 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:5851

The Delhi High Court allowed admission to an ST category candidate who missed the cut-off date due to bereavement and administrative delays, directing the University to grant admission and make suitable arrangements.

administrative petition_allowed Significant admission cut-off date Scheduled Tribe category University of Delhi writ petition

Umang Bharadwaj v. University of Delhi

08 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:5850

The Delhi High Court held that supplementary exam results relate back to the original exam date for eligibility, allowing petitioners admission to the LL.M. course despite results being declared after the cut-off date.

administrative petition_allowed Significant supplementary examination eligibility criteria cut-off date admission

Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Nov 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:5848-DB

The Delhi High Court held that prior contractual service does not entitle a candidate to age relaxation if already overage, restoring the petitioner's appointment as Lab Attendant and setting aside the CAT order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age relaxation contractual service Lab Attendant Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti

U. C. Sharma v. Union of India and Anr.

08 Nov 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:5849-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's dismissal of the petitioner's contempt and review applications for non-compliance of pay arrears and increments, finding no error or wilful disobedience.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt Petition Central Administrative Tribunal Payment of Wages Act, 1936 increments

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. REENA & ORS

08 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5894

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing loss of future prospects to 40% and upheld insurer's liability despite alleged non-payment of premium, modifying the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of future prospects motor accident claim insurance policy premium compensation modification

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Kamla Devi & Ors.

08 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5893

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the insurer liable based on credible eye-witness testimony and adverse inference from the insurer's failure to summon the driver.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim eye-witness testimony rash and negligent driving insurance liability