Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute v. Giridhari Pal

04 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5050-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the promotion of a Technical Assistant to Senior Technical Assistant w.e.f. 21.07.2016, rejecting claims for earlier promotion due to recruitment rules and delay.

labor appeal_dismissed promotion Senior Technical Assistant direct recruitment recruitment rules

M/S NEUTRAL NVOCC PVT.LTD. v. M/S CARGOCARE FREIGHT AND FORWARDING PVT. LTD.

04 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5034-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring a suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to deficiency in affixation of stamps on summons, granting the appellant an opportunity to cure the defect.

civil appeal_allowed Order IX Rule 9 CPC restoration of suit non-prosecution deficiency in stamps

East Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Siroman Singh

04 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award entitling a workman performing duties of Garden Chaudhary to the corresponding pay scale from the date of such duties, despite lack of formal promotion or trade test qualification at that time.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Garden Chaudhary Mali Pay scale entitlement

Rinku Saini v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:5001

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307/34 IPC due to lack of common intention and modified it to voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 IPC, reducing the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention attempt to murder

NBCC (INDIA) LTD. v. MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL & ANR.

04 Jul 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:4998-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the referral of a dispute to arbitration under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act, holding that the arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction to decide its own competence, distinct from the court's pre-referral jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant MSMED Act 2006 Section 18(3) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11(6)

Union of India v. M/S Shivalik Fasteners Pvt. Ltd

04 Jul 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:4980

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting the Union's reduction of contract quantity without reasonable notice and set aside pre-award interest contrary to contract terms.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Quantity Option Clause Contractual notice

Apple Sponge and Power Limited v. Punjab National Bank

04 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4969

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction to the bank to accept a One Time Settlement proposal, holding that the bank's commercial decision to reject a low offer amid ongoing recovery and insolvency proceedings is not subject to judicial interference.

civil appeal_dismissed One Time Settlement RBI circular stressed assets NPA account

Shri Ram Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd v. Mumtaz Begum & Ors.

04 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4967

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal challenging the compensation calculation order, holding that issues not raised earlier cannot be entertained at this stage.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 10 EC Act employee-employer relationship compensation calculation

Jos Chiramel v. National Highways Authority of India

04 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4966

The High Court held that a Trial Court cannot limit a plaint to an arbitrary page count under Order VI Rule 16 CPC without specifying offending parts and valid grounds for striking out pleadings.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 16 CPC striking out pleadings lengthy plaint abuse of process

FIITJEE LTD v. SNEH LATA

04 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4965

The Delhi High Court set aside the NCDRC's dismissal of a consumer revision petition for non-prosecution due to counsel's unavailability and restored the petition for hearing on merits.

consumer appeal_allowed non-prosecution revision petition National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissal set aside

Sanju Rana v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

04 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4963

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death and murder case considering divergent medical opinions, polygraph results, prolonged custody, and absence of risk of witness tampering or flight.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail dowry death Section 302 IPC Section 304B IPC

Saurav Chaudhary v. Union of India & Anr.

04 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4946

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a patent application abandoned due to patent agent's negligence, emphasizing the duty of patent agents and the court's power to condone delay in exceptional cases.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent application abandonment First Examination Report patent agent negligence writ jurisdiction

ASF Buildtech Private Limited v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited

04 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4943
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to implead non-signatory group companies under the Group of Companies doctrine and dismissed challenges to their inclusion and the arbitrator's mandate.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Section 16 Group of Companies doctrine

Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Durga Prasad

04 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5025

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Ghaziabad Development Authority's petition under Article 227, upholding consumer fora orders that held the respondent a consumer despite possession and Sale Deed, emphasizing limited revisional jurisdiction and supervisory powers.

consumer_protection petition_dismissed Consumer Protection Act Article 227 Revisional jurisdiction Jurisdictional error

Nafees Ahmed v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd

04 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5077
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that disputes involving allegations of coercion and accord and satisfaction are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not the court at the appointment stage.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Appointment of arbitrator

MS Krishan Kumar and Sons v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd

04 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5076
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that allegations of coercion cannot be examined at this stage and the disputes are prima facie arbitrable.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 pre-arbitral protocol

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Arun Malhotra

03 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:5045-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of additions under Section 69A and allowed deduction under Section 80HHC, emphasizing the need for cogent evidence and proper adjudication in block assessment proceedings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant block assessment Section 69A Section 80HHC cross-examination

Pancham Lal v. Rakesh Kumar

03 Jul 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4924

The Delhi High Court held that under Order XV-A CPC, courts can direct deposit of enhanced mesne profits based on market rent during pendency of suit, overruling trial court’s order limiting rent deposit to admitted rent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC mesne profits unauthorized occupation rent deposit

Rajnish Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

03 Jul 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4925-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an officer cannot decide his own adverse appraisal order and directed fresh consideration of the petitioner’s representation by an independent authority, while affirming territorial jurisdiction and procedural fairness in service matters.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant PPAR downgrading natural justice representation against adverse remarks territorial jurisdiction

Yashpal Sinh Jadeja v. All India Council for Technical Education

03 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bahkru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4894-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld AICTE's cutoff date for recognition of equivalence of AMIE courses, affirming that only statutory universities can confer engineering degrees and MHRD lacks power to grant equivalence beyond 31.05.2013.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant AICTE equivalence AMIE courses Institution of Engineers (India)