Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Imran Khan and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

05 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4973
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Parveen Singh & Ors. v. The State, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.

05 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4976

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, 377, and 494 IPC following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 494 IPC

Sushila @ Maya Devi & Anr. v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 337

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellants' convictions under Sections 304B and 498A IPC due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and failure to prove dowry death beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC material improvements

Yamuna Khadar Slum Union v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Jul 2024 · Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4997-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a slum union illegally occupying the Yamuna riverbed, upholding demolition orders and denying rehabilitation benefits due to non-notification and ecological concerns.

property appeal_dismissed Significant illegal encroachment Yamuna floodplain Delhi Development Authority slum rehabilitation policy

Jagdeep Singh v. Kanwaljeet Singh & Ors.

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4986

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to be deleted as a party in a tenancy suit, holding that such factual disputes must be resolved at trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Order I Rule 10 CPC deletion of parties joint tenancy tenancy dispute

Sunita v. Lalit Sansanwal

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4984

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order restoring a dismissed petition, emphasizing a liberal approach to restoration to protect the fundamental right to represent one's cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant restoration of petition non-prosecution non-appearance liberal approach

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd v. Vijay Lifters

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4983

The High Court reduced the cost imposed on the defendant for delayed filing of the written statement and permitted it to be taken on record subject to payment of the reduced cost.

civil appeal_allowed written statement cost imposition delay in filing condonation of delay

Sharmila Singh v. Master Abhimanyu Singh

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4982

The Delhi High Court set aside the order striking off the defence for delay, allowing the petitioner to participate in interim maintenance proceedings subject to costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant striking off defence delay in filing written statement Affidavit of Income and Assets interim maintenance

Maulana Abdul Subhan v. Mohd. Omar Faridi

05 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:4981

The High Court set aside the order striking off the petitioner’s defense, allowed him to defend the suit, and imposed costs for delay.

civil appeal_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India striking off defense setting aside interlocutory order costs for delay

Mrs. R v. The Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors.

05 Jul 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4977

The Delhi High Court allowed medical termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks based on conclusive diagnosis of substantial fetal abnormalities and upheld the petitioner’s reproductive rights under Article 21.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Section 3(2B) Section 3(3) fetal abnormalities

Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd v. Micro & Small Enterprises Facilitation Council & Anr

05 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal

The Delhi High Court held that the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council has jurisdiction to refer disputes to arbitration under the 2006 Act for supplies made after registration, regardless of contract date, dismissing MRPL's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Micro and Small Enterprises and Development Act, 2006 Section 18 jurisdiction arbitration referral registration under Section 8

Prashant Kumar Sona & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Jul 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order denying retrospective seniority to Section Officers promoted through delayed LDCE, holding seniority must be fixed from actual promotion date when the quota rule breaks down due to prolonged deferment.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant retrospective seniority Limited Departmental Competitive Examination quota rule rota rule

Pacific Convergence Corpn Ltd. v. Data Access (India) Ltd.

05 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4964

The Delhi High Court dismissed SMS Textiles Limited's application for possession of property in a winding up proceeding, holding that the applicant was a shell company involved in fraudulent diversion of funds and not entitled to relief against the Official Liquidator.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Companies Act 1956 Official Liquidator winding up corporate veil

Casa 2 Stays Pvt. Ltd. v. VLCC Personal Care Ltd.

05 Jul 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4968

The High Court set aside the trial court's order allowing additional documents to be placed on record under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, holding that the respondent failed to establish reasonable cause for non-disclosure at the time of filing the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 additional documents reasonable cause

Magma HDI General Insurance Co Ltd v. Harish Kumar Sukhija

05 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4958

The Delhi High Court upheld liability in a motor accident claim, enhanced compensation for grievous injuries causing vegetative state, and refined principles for assessing attendant charges, disability, and interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Compensation Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Eyewitness testimony

Shashi Bala Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority

05 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:4971

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking alternate flat allotment due to petitioner’s inordinate delay and non-compliance by the original allottee leading to cancellation of allotment.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 writ petition delay and laches allotment cancellation

ITW GSE APS & ANR v. DABICO AIRPORTSOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS

04 Jul 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:4978

The Delhi High Court held that the suit patent for a preconditioned air unit with variable frequency driving is not limited to modular embodiments and granted interim relief for patent infringement against defendants’ PCA units.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent claim construction Preconditioned air unit Variable frequency driver Modularity

Shruti Vora v. Equestrian Federation of India & Ors.

04 Jul 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4959
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Equestrian Federation of India's Olympic Dressage selection criteria as rational and consistent with international standards, dismissing the petition challenging the selection of the athlete for the Paris 2024 Olympics.

sports_administrative petition_dismissed Significant Equestrian Federation of India Dressage Olympic selection criteria Minimum Eligibility Requirement

Srinivasa v. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Agriculture Insurance Company of India

04 Jul 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:5100

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging non-selection in a recruitment process, holding that the authority lawfully fixed minimum qualifying marks for the interview as reserved in the recruitment notice and the petitioner was estopped from disputing the criteria after participation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment process minimum qualifying marks interview eligibility doctrine of election

Md. Ayub Pathan v. The State of NCT Delhi

04 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5198
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the petitioner found with commercial quantity heroin, holding that bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and not likely to reoffend, which were absent here.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail in commercial quantity cases reasonable grounds for bail