Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Prem Arora v. Kartar Chand through LR Rajiv Arora & Ors.

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5043

The High Court directed the trial court to promptly decide interlocutory applications under Order XII Rule 6 and Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC, rejecting indefinite postponement to ensure expeditious disposal of a long-pending possession suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC Section 227 Constitution of India interlocutory application

Subhash Chand Jain v. Satish Kumar

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5042

The High Court clarified that interim orders dismissing injunction applications are tentative and do not constitute final findings on the merits of the suit.

civil petition_dismissed Order XXXIX CPC interim injunction prima facie observations tentative order

Mohd. Samar v. Waseem Ahmed & Anr.

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5041

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to produce a society’s Registration Certificate and examine a witness in execution proceedings, setting aside the Trial Court’s refusal.

civil appeal_allowed Execution Petition Registration Certificate Registrar of Societies Examination of Witness

RHC Ventures Limited v. Kitchannagari Sarveshwarsa Reddy

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5040

The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a petition against an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose in Telangana and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Shiv Sagar Developers and Ors. v. Tilak Nagar Audumbar Cooperative Housing Society

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5038

Delhi High Court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 227 against NCDRC order when cause of action arose outside Delhi and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Yogesh v. Priya

08 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5037

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's imposition of litigation expenses and adjournment for non-payment in a divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, dismissing the petition challenging these orders.

family petition_dismissed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 litigation expenses Article 227 Constitution of India

Union of India v. RCCIVL-LITL (Joint Venture)

08 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:4999-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the intra court appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the appellant was not denied opportunity to present its case and the award was not vitiated by patent illegality or inconsistency.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 patent illegality

Monica Gogia v. M/S RSS Estate LLP & Anr

08 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:5028

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining defendants from alienating disputed property and blocking plaintiff's access, holding that registered Sale Deeds can be challenged on grounds of fraud and non-payment of consideration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction Agreement to Sell Sale Deed fraud

Rajan Tewari v. Durgesh Kumar Pathak & Anr.

08 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma, J. · 2024:DHC:4979

The Delhi High Court dismissed the election petition challenging the returned candidate's election for failure to plead material facts showing corrupt practice or material effect on election result, affirming the scope of disclosure obligations under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant election petition corrupt practice non-disclosure criminal antecedents

Kapil Dutt v. The State

08 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:5023

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a 1992 Will executed by Late Major M.S.N. Dutt and granted Probate to the petitioners, rejecting challenges based on joint family property claims and undue influence.

civil petition_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Probate Will validity Section 63 Indian Succession Act

Hamdard Public School v. Augustine MJ & Ors.

08 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1532-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of amounts deposited by the appellant pursuant to a consent settlement with Respondent 1, disposing of the appeal without affecting the merits of the case.

civil appeal_dismissed deposit with Registry withdrawal of deposited amount consent settlement finality of dispute

Sohan Lal Commodity Management Limited v. Jhawar Traders

07 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6170

The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings with no objection from respondents.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Section 29A(4) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Ritu Bharadwaj & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

05 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:5252

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of petitioners under the Senior Citizens Act but enhanced the rent payable for alternate accommodation, clarifying that title disputes are to be decided by civil courts.

family petition_allowed Significant Senior Citizens Act eviction alternate accommodation maintenance

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. BRINDCO SALES PVT LTD

05 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5250-DB

The Delhi High Court held that leftover liquor stock of registered brands can be disposed of under Rule 56 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 without re-registration after license expiry, dismissing GNCTD's appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Excise Rules 2010 leftover stock disposal liquor license expiry brand re-registration

Dr. Raisa Parveen v. The Principal, Satyawati College Morning (Delhi University) & Ors.

05 Jul 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:5169

The Delhi High Court held that delayed payment of retirement gratuity to an NPS subscriber attracts interest at 8% per annum from the due date until actual payment, affirming that pension and gratuity are valuable rights and not discretionary bounties.

labor petition_allowed Significant retirement gratuity Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 interest on delayed payment New Pension Scheme

Court on Its Own Motion v. Pradeep Aggarwal

05 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5031

The Delhi High Court held that demanding money for withdrawal of a writ petition amounts to criminal contempt, upheld the conviction of Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal, and imposed a lenient sentence considering his age and apology.

criminal conviction_upheld Significant criminal contempt Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 unauthorized construction writ petition

ITC LIMITED v. ELORA TOBACCO COMPANY LIMITED

05 Jul 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5030

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to include additional infringing marks in a trademark infringement suit, emphasizing that amendments are permissible to address real controversies and prevent multiplicity of proceedings when defendants have not yet appeared.

civil other amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC trademark infringement well-known trademark

Capt. Karan Mehta v. Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Others

05 Jul 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:5012

The Delhi High Court upheld the three-year suspension of a pilot's license for a second positive pre-flight Breath Analyzer test, affirming strict compliance with civil aviation regulations and procedural fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Breath Analyzer test Aircraft Rules 1937 Civil Aviation Requirements pilot license suspension

Anurag Nanda and Anr. v. State and Anr.

05 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4974

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 504, and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in a minor offence dispute.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Union of India v. M/S Jay Shree Metals and Engg. Co.

05 Jul 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:4970
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of delay in filing restoration application after dismissal of arbitration challenge petition, holding that the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for the nearly four-year delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay restoration application Order IX Rule 9 CPC Section 5 Limitation Act