Delhi High Court
46,072 judgments
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation despite route permit violations but can recover the amount from the insured owner/driver who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation despite route permit violations and can recover the amount from the insured, with compensation including non-pecuniary damages and interest at 9% per annum.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants despite the insured vehicle operating beyond the permitted route, with the right to recover from the owner and driver, and compensation includes non-pecuniary damages with interest at 9% per annum.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation despite route permit violations but can recover the amount from the insured who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation despite breach of route permit but can recover the amount from the owner/driver; non-pecuniary damages and 9% interest are payable to claimants.
Pradeep & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainants' decision not to prosecute.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation despite route permit violations but can recover the amount from the insured who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation despite breach of route permit conditions but retains the right to recover from the owner/driver, with compensation including non-pecuniary damages and interest at 9% per annum.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation despite breach of route permit conditions but can recover the amount from the insured owner and driver who failed to contest.
Muhammad Ajmal v. Delhi Waqf Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to appoint the CEO of the Delhi Waqf Board and mandated prompt removal of encroachments from waqf property, enforcing the Board's statutory duties under the Waqf Act, 1995.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation despite the vehicle operating beyond the permitted route but retains the right to recover the amount from the owner/driver who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation despite route permit violations but retains the right to recover from the owner/driver who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer is liable to pay third-party compensation even if the insured vehicle was operated beyond the permitted route, but has the right to recover the amount from the insured who breached policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation for accidents involving vehicles operated beyond permitted routes but retains the right to recover from the insured owner and driver in breach of policy conditions.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nathu Singh & Ors.
The insurer must pay third-party compensation despite the insured vehicle operating beyond the permitted route, with a right to recover from the owner/driver who breached policy conditions.
Concept Communication Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, regularizing prior delay upon parties' consent and assurances against further adjournments.
Jarar Ahmad Khan v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed anticipatory bail and set aside Non-Bailable Warrants against the petitioner, holding that procedural lapses and non-willful absence do not justify custodial arrest where the charge-sheet was filed without arrest.
Maqsood Ahmad Khan v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside Non-Bailable Warrants and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a sexual offence case where the charge-sheet was filed without arrest and the petitioner had shown bonafide intention to appear.
Union of India v. Maqbool Ahmed Qureshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Department of Expenditure's refusal to revive a long-vacant post, limiting judicial interference in administrative decisions on deemed abolished posts.
Dr Rajat Duhan & Ors. v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld AIIMS's higher eligibility criteria for foreign medical graduates' PG admissions, ruling that courts should not interfere with academic standards set by expert institutions.