Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that NOIDA's activities were not commercial in nature under Section 10(46) of the Income Tax Act, and directed the CBDT to grant tax exemption on its specified income.
Concept Horizon Infra Pvt. Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Suninder Sandha
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 138 NI Act cannot be stayed pending criminal trials on related fraud allegations, dismissing the petition seeking such stay.
Shanti Devi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that payment of tehbazari fees and government policies did not confer proprietary rights over the coal depot land, and upheld the cancellation of the license and sealing of the premises.
Ravinder Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that payment of tehbazari license fees and temporary government policies do not confer proprietary rights over government land, and the petitioner failed to establish any such right to warrant interim relief.
Rajbir Singh & Anr v. Sanjeevan Prakash & Anr
The High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioners' application to reject the plaint on limitation grounds, holding that the suit for damages due to mental harassment involves a continuous cause of action and is not barred by the one-year limitation applicable to defamation suits.
Prachin Shiv Mandir Avam Akhada Samiti v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against demolition of an unauthorized temple on Yamuna floodplain land, holding that DDA had authority to remove encroachments without violating natural justice where no legal ownership was shown.
Shahnawaz Mohamed Hanif Malang v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed the Look Out Circulars against petitioners not evading arrest, directing their closure while requiring trial court permission for travel abroad.
M/S COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. v. Sh. Suraj Chauhan
The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1.73 crore with 9% interest, relying on uncontested evidence and dishonoured cheques, while reducing the claimed interest rate from 18% to 9%.
Ramdev Mukhiya @ Ramrekh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of murder charges under Section 302 IPC despite the FIR and charge sheet under Section 304 IPC, holding that the question of grave and sudden provocation is a trial issue and the court is not bound by the prosecution's charge sheet.
Mohamad Imran v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a homebuyer seeking to restrain banks from charging EMIs under a Subvention Plan, holding that disputes under the SARFAESI Act and contractual agreements must be resolved through statutory forums, not writ jurisdiction.
Jitender Chopra v. Y.S. Manchanda
The court held that in suits involving deceased parties with disputed Wills, all legal heirs and claimants should be impleaded as legal representatives, with Will validity to be decided separately in probate proceedings.
Tannu Ruhela v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay violating fundamental rights, while emphasizing statutory compliance and trial adjudication of procedural lapses.
Sagar v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 354D, 506, and 509 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Vikash Kumar Jha v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 408 and 354A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Atul Goyal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Jatin Kumar Chaurasia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354B, 498A, 406, 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Kamla Vohra v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 52
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a GST show cause notice under 'Additional Notices' does not constitute valid service under Section 169 CGST Act, set aside the order, and remanded for fresh adjudication after proper service.
M/S Lakshman Pran Data Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax, Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for lack of a proper personal hearing and reasons, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
M/S Rajdhani Trading Co. v. Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for failure to provide personal hearing, directing restoration subject to compliance with outstanding dues.
M S Antarctica Properties Company Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld DMRC's cancellation of a tender bid substantially below reserve price, ruling that such rejection was lawful, non-arbitrary, and within the tender conditions.