Delhi High Court
102,337 judgments
Jeet Singh Chauhan v. Land Acquisition Collector, South East District
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to forward a stale Section 18 reference application under the Land Acquisition Act, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedy under Section 28A instead.
India Tourism Development Corporation v. M/S. C.P. & Associates Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed ITDC's review petitions challenging arbitral awards, holding that grounds not pressed during original proceedings cannot be raised in review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Residents Welfare Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking demolition of alleged encroachments on public land for lack of joinder of necessary parties and failure to follow procedural safeguards.
Chintpurni Medical College and Hospital and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Council of India's refusal to permit a medical college to admit students without fulfilling conditions of conditional recognition and undergoing fresh inspection and renewal under the Indian Medical Council Act.
All India Radio Casual Announcer and Comperes Union v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking resumption of AIR services and compensation to contractual workers by directing the authorities to treat the petition as a representation and decide it expeditiously in accordance with law.
Nirmal Devi & Anr. v. Rakesh Kumar Jain & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of applications for additional evidence at the appellate stage, holding that the petitioners failed to show due diligence for non-production of documents during trial as required under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) CPC.
Amanpreet Singh Kohli v. Pankaj Dayal
The Delhi High Court held that interim orders affecting a non-party company cannot be granted in suits against its directors without impleading the company, dismissing the appeal against vacation of such an order.
Dr. Suresh Chandra Gupta v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a surgeon accused of medical negligence causing death, relying on disciplinary findings and prima facie evidence of unqualified conduct.
Naresh Nagar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking directions to restore water supply and stop illegal factories by directing authorities to consider the petitioner’s representations in accordance with law.
Ant Ram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the hospital to reinstate terminated contractual employees on prior terms during the pandemic, emphasizing preference for experienced workers and employer responsibility.
Syed Sadique Raza v. Jamia Millia Islamia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a student barred from 5th semester exams due to low attendance, holding that attendance and passing prior semester exams are mandatory for promotion and result declaration.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners holding No Objection Certificates, following established precedents.
Dominant Systems Private Limited v. Surjeet Singh
The Delhi High Court held that assisting a relative in a family business does not necessarily constitute gainful employment under Section 17B of the ID Act and directed payment of 50% wages pending appeal due to insufficient evidence of adequate income.
Secretary Delhi General Workers Union v. Vijay Kumar Uppal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against Union Bank for alleged non-compliance of reinstatement orders, holding the Bank had complied by allowing the workmen to report and attaching them as drivers, and disposed the petition in light of a detailed judgment on regularization.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to discharged personnel holding NOCs, following established precedents.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears to ex-servicemen petitioners within 12 weeks, consistent with prior precedents, or provide written reasons for denial.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners in line with established precedents, allowing their petitions conditionally.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging AFT orders denying pro rata pension, holding the AFT bound by High Court precedents and directing payment with arrears and interest.
Anadi Charan Roul v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to pay pro-rata pension arrears with interest to ex-servicemen petitioners in line with established precedents or provide written reasons for denial within 12 weeks.
Om Prakash Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's denial of pro rata pension, holding that the Tribunal must follow binding precedents and directing payment of pension with arrears and interest.