Delhi High Court
100,822 judgments
Royale Blue Club Private Ltd. v. OYO Hotels and Homes Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted interim possession relief but referred all substantive monetary and other claims to the Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Royale Blue Club Private Ltd v. OYO Hotels and Homes Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after parties failed to mutually agree, enabling arbitration proceedings to commence.
Dev J Roy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the temporary upgradation and appointment of the Custodian, holding no violation of Article 14 or principles of judicial hierarchy.
M/S Intercorp Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies
The High Court quashed the summoning and framing of notice orders against M/s Intercorp Industries Ltd. for non-application of mind due to absence of supporting documents on record, emphasizing the necessity of judicial scrutiny at the initial stage of criminal proceedings.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. FEPL Engineering (P) Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the 75% pre-deposit under Section 19 of the MSME Act includes both principal and interest components of an arbitral award and directed the petitioner to deposit the interest portion while allowing partial release of the pre-deposit to the respondent on furnishing security.
Vinay Vats v. Fox Star Studios India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application against the film "Lootcase," holding that mere similarity in plot ideas does not constitute copyright infringement and criticizing the plaintiff's last-minute approach.
Mahua Bindal and Ors. v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld GGSIPU's policy of reserving 50% State Quota postgraduate medical seats for its own MBBS graduates by Institutional Preference, dismissing challenges based on Article 14 and lack of State Government policy, relying on binding Supreme Court precedents.
HYOSUNG CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to decide the petitioner’s pending rectification application within six weeks and release any refund due with interest, emphasizing compliance with statutory timelines under the Income Tax Act.
Pirthi Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with a Full Bench clarification on automatic extension of interim bail during the COVID-19 period.
Farhal v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with the Full Bench order providing automatic extension of interim bail granted before or after 16.03.2020.
Sajid Ali Abdul Qadir v. Union Public Service Commission
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing UPSC to restore the petitioner's candidature under the EWS category by permitting rectification of defective Income and Asset Certificates submitted before the cut-off date.
HYOSUNG CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to dispose of the petitioner’s rectification application within six weeks and allow adjustment of the acknowledged tax demand against refunds in accordance with law.
Dinesh Bahadur Singh v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Delhi High Court quashed the wilful defaulter declaration against petitioners for non-compliance with procedural safeguards mandated by the RBI Master Circular and Supreme Court, directing fresh proceedings with due opportunity of representation.
Nishant Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Appeal Medical Board's decision on medical unfitness for Indian Air Force Airmen recruitment is final, dismissing the petitioner's plea for a fresh medical examination.
Kulwant Rai Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a BSF officer, holding that adhoc attachments do not confer a right to complete a three-year tenure under BSF rules and absent mala fide, transfer orders will not be interfered with.
Vijesh Kumar M and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to grant pay fixation and arrears to Head Constables (Driver/DCPO) petitioners in accordance with a prior judgment, or provide reasons for denial.
Pankaj Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative transfer of a railway officer within Delhi and directed consideration of his request for lighter duties by a reasoned order.
Abhijit Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking inclusion of advocates as professionals under the MSME Act, holding that advocates can approach courts individually and PIL is not maintainable for their benefit.
Ramesh Kakkar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with the Full Bench clarification on automatic extension of bail during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anil Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a government servant convicted of theft, holding that concurrent appointing authorities can validly impose dismissal without violating Article 311(1) of the Constitution.