Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

DSSSB AND ANR v. PAWAN KUMAR

24 Jul 2024 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT; GIRISH KATHPALIA · 2024:DHC:5477-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a waitlisted candidate whose entitlement arose due to the selection authority's failure to act within the waitlist validity period.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant waitlist validity reserve panel appointment entitlement recruitment rules

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Deepak Yadav

24 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5480-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal’s order allowing a candidate with a faded tattoo, undergoing removal, to join police training, ruling that mere presence of a faded tattoo is not valid ground for medical disqualification.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tattoo medical disqualification constable recruitment physical endurance test

Jai Karan v. Delhi Jal Board

24 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5439-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld government orders allowing only 50% of work charge service to count for pension, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for full service recognition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant work charge service qualifying service pension calculation Office Memoranda

Amar Nath Gupta v. Union of India

24 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:5441-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a belated option for CPF Scheme after the cut-off date is invalid, entitling the employee to pension under the Pension Scheme with interest on delayed arrears from the date pension was due.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Scheme Office Memorandum 01.05.1987 Cut-off date 30.09.1987

KARMYOGI BUILDERS PVT LTD v. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES

24 Jul 2024 · DHARMESH SHARMA · 2024:DHC:5445

The Delhi High Court held that restoration of a company struck off under the Companies Act, 2013 lies exclusively with the NCLT and dismissed the petitioner’s application seeking revival through the High Court.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Company restoration Registrar of Companies Striking off Companies Act 2013

T.S. Sawhney & N.P. Singh v. State Bank of India

24 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the lease expired by efflux of time without renewal, the defendant's possession thereafter was unauthorized, and the plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits and damages accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Lease renewal Mesne profits Transfer of Property Act Section 53-A Transfer of Property Act Section 116

Staff Selection Commission v. Viraaj Singh

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7466-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist's assessment to determine the presence of a tattoo on the right forearm, dismissing the petition challenging this procedural direction.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination tattoo prohibition Delhi Police recruitment Clause 13.[2]

Staff Selection Commission v. Priti Bhati

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7465-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist's assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in light of tattoo restrictions.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination tattoo restriction functional fitness Constable recruitment

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Sonu

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7918-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing a remedical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for appointment as a Delhi Police Constable, dismissing the petition challenging this direction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant remedical examination dermatologist functional fitness tattoo restriction

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Monu Kumar

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7604-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for police constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions, dismissing the petition challenging it.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination dermatologist tattoo restriction functional fitness

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Ankush

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7904-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess tattoo presence on candidates' right forearms in Delhi Police recruitment, dismissing the Staff Selection Commission's challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed Staff Selection Commission Central Administrative Tribunal re-medical examination dermatologist

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. KM Lalita

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7956-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in Delhi Police under tattoo restrictions.

administrative petition_dismissed medical examination functional fitness tattoo restriction Delhi Police recruitment

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Shivam Kumar

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7988-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the candidate's fitness regarding a tattoo restriction in Delhi Police recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination functional fitness tattoo restriction Delhi Police recruitment

Divakar Upadhyaya v. Amit Kumar

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8251-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a Medical Board including a dermatologist to verify the absence of tattoos on the candidate's right forearm as per recruitment rules for Delhi Police Constable.

administrative petition_dismissed Staff Selection Commission Medical Board Dermatologist Tattoo

Staff Selection Commission v. Deepak Kumar

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8278-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a dermatological re-medical examination to determine the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in light of tattoo restrictions.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination functional fitness tattoo restriction Delhi Police recruitment

Staff Selection Commission v. KM Sonika

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:8802-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tribunal's direction for re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the candidate's fitness and compliance with the tattoo clause for Delhi Police Constable recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed Staff Selection Commission Delhi Police Constable recruitment medical examination tattoo clause

Vedansh Anand v. Dharam Singh Yadav

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9043-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions.

administrative petition_dismissed re-medical examination dermatologist tattoo restriction functional fitness

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Rocky Kumar

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9555-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including dermatologist assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment, dismissing the petition challenging it.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant re-medical examination functional fitness tattoo disqualification Clause 13.[2]

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Rohit Yadav

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9552-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist's assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for police recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant re-medical examination tattoo restriction functional fitness dermatologist opinion

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Upendra Singh

24 Jul 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9162-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s direction for a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to verify the absence of a tattoo on the right forearm as a valid recruitment condition for the post of Constable in Delhi Police.

administrative petition_dismissed medical examination dermatologist tattoo functional fitness