Delhi High Court

99,566 judgments

Year:

B.S. Methaila v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 Sep 2020 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:2912

The Delhi High Court directed release of provisional pension to the petitioner upon clearance of outstanding dues and furnishing of a No Objection Certificate, despite an ongoing departmental inquiry.

administrative petition_allowed provisional pension CCS Pension Rules 1972 compulsory retirement penalty de novo inquiry

Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

30 Sep 2020 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2020:DHC:2905

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and criminal intimidation charges due to material inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative forensic evidence, holding that conviction cannot rest on unreliable testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony material inconsistencies forensic evidence

Mahender Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

30 Sep 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2907

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement compromise deed Section 482 CrPC

Butani Civil Projects Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

30 Sep 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:2916

The Delhi High Court allowed the voluntary winding up petition of Butani Civil Projects Pvt. Ltd. under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, ordering its dissolution after confirming compliance with statutory requirements.

corporate petition_allowed voluntary winding up Companies Act 1956 declaration of solvency voluntary liquidator

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ram Swaroop Chandel & Ors.

30 Sep 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2903

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that mere recovery of money without proof of demand is insufficient for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act demand of illegal gratification recovery of bribe money Section 7 PC Act

State Bank of India v. Ram Kumar Jain

30 Sep 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2913

The Delhi High Court dismissed SBI's second appeal, holding that the bank could not reverse a wrongly credited cheque amount after a long delay and without returning the dishonoured cheque, thereby upholding the decree in favor of the customer.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant banking law wrongful credit dishonoured cheque limitation period

Irteza Zulfikar v. RITES Ltd. and Anr.

29 Sep 2020 · Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh · 2020:DHC:2896-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed RITES Ltd.'s review petition, holding that the limited scope of review jurisdiction does not permit re-argument or correction of non-apparent errors in orders directing consideration for regularisation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC error apparent on face of record regularisation

Col Mukul Dev v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2891-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Armed Forces Tribunal to jointly hear related petitions affecting the petitioner’s promotion and stay his superannuation pending final orders to avoid conflicting decisions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal interim relief superannuation promotion

Ashok Vishwakarma v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2898-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the retirement of a BSF personnel without pensionary benefits on grounds of plural marriages under Rule 26 of the BSF Rules, rejecting the claim that dismissal required trial by a Security Force Court.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Rules, 1969 plural marriages retirement on grounds of unsuitability Security Force Court

Dhruv Jakhar v. Union of India

29 Sep 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2890-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the withdrawal of a cadet from the Indian Military Academy, holding that disciplinary actions taken in accordance with military rules and after due process are not subject to judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Indian Military Academy disciplinary proceedings relegation withdrawal

National Federation of the Blind v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Sep 2020 · Chief Justice D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:2901-DB

The Delhi High Court directed States and Union Territories to include persons with disabilities as a separate category of beneficiaries under the National Food Security Act, 2013, in compliance with Central Government directions issued under Section 38 of the Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant National Food Security Act, 2013 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Antyodaya Anna Yojana Priority Household

Bennett Coleman and Co Ltd v. Broadcast Audience Research Council India

29 Sep 2020 · Navin Chawla · 2020:DHC:2894

Delhi High Court dismisses petition challenging BARC's new TV rating algorithms, affirming TDSAT jurisdiction and emphasizing transparency without granting interim relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TRAI Act jurisdiction Television Rating Point Landing Page

National Highways Authority of India v. Sahakar Global Limited

29 Sep 2020 · Rekha Palli · 2020:DHC:2900

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award recognizing GST implementation as a Force Majeure event affecting toll collection contracts, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Force Majeure Change in Law Goods and Services Tax Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Rohit Farms Private Limited v. Official Liquidator

29 Sep 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:2902

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition to dissolve Rohit Farms Private Limited under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 after statutory compliance and satisfaction of no outstanding liabilities.

corporate petition_allowed Members' Voluntary Liquidation Companies Act 1956 Section 497(6) Official Liquidator

Advance Magazine Publishers Inc v. Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd

29 Sep 2020 · Navin Chawla · 2020:DHC:2895

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a trademark infringement suit to a judge at his new posting as Additional Sessions Judge, holding that such judge retains jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction is not a bar under Section 24 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant transfer of suit Section 134 Trade Marks Act Additional Sessions Judge jurisdiction Section 24 CPC

Ratnesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2897-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Non-Commissioned Officers of the Indian Air Force who leave service after 10 years but before 15 years are entitled to pro-rata pension benefits, directing the respondents to grant such pension with arrears and interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Non-Commissioned Officer Indian Air Force discrimination

The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. A. Raja & Ors.

29 Sep 2020 · Brijesh Sethi · 2020:DHC:2892
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed early hearing of criminal leave petitions against acquittal, emphasizing the need to conclude part-heard matters expeditiously despite Covid-19 and voluminous records, applying the principle that leave to appeal should be granted if prima facie arguable points exist.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal leave petition leave to appeal acquittal Section 378 CrPC

Bilal v. State of NCT Delhi

29 Sep 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:2893

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's interim bail application under Section 302 IPC, holding that the High Powered Committee's recommendations are only recommendatory and that the gravity of the offence and trial stage do not warrant bail.

criminal petition_dismissed interim bail Section 302 IPC High Powered Committee recommendations undertrial prisoner

R. Jani v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Sep 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2899-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the transfer of an Air Force officer during a pending inquiry into his alleged plural marriage, holding that the petitioner must seek relief before the Family Court and internal complaint mechanisms.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition transfer order plural marriage Indian Air Force

Dalip Singh v. Jaswant Rai Garg

29 Sep 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5048

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition for appointment of arbitrator as premature for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-arbitration amicable settlement protocol under the parties' agreement.

arbitration petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) pre-arbitration protocol amicable settlement