Delhi High Court

99,566 judgments

Year:

Link Quest Technologies Limited v. The Commissioner of Income Tax TDS Delhi I New Delhi & Anr.

05 Oct 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:2932-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the assessing authority to decide the pending revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act within four weeks by passing a reasoned order, without quashing the impugned TDS certificate.

tax other Procedural Tax Deducted at Source Section 197 Income Tax Act Section 264 Income Tax Act Revision application

Ritesh Ranjan & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission & Anr.

01 Oct 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2917

The Delhi High Court upheld the conduct of the Civil Services Preliminary Examination amid COVID-19, directing authorities to ensure candidates' access to centres, including those in containment zones, in compliance with MHA guidelines and Supreme Court directions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Civil Services Examination COVID-19 Containment Zones Social Distancing

S. S. Tyagi v. Ravindra Public School & Anr.

01 Oct 2020 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:2924

Suspension of a teacher by a recognised private school without prior approval of the Directorate of Education lapses after fifteen days, entitling the teacher to full salary for the invalid suspension period.

labor petition_allowed Significant suspension Delhi School Education Act, 1973 prior approval Director of Education

Jamia Hamdard (Deemed University) v. Hamdard National Foundation (India)

01 Oct 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:2925-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a non-party deemed university challenging a family settlement compromise decree, holding that only parties aggrieved by a decree have locus standi to appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compromise decree person aggrieved locus standi non-party appeal

Gagninder Kumar Gandhi & Anr. v. Vijay Gupta & Anr.

01 Oct 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2920

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to decide as a preliminary issue whether an unregistered undertaking evidencing a collateral transaction is enforceable under Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908.

civil other Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Registration Act 1908 Section 49 Registration Act collateral transaction

Parnita Kapoor & Ors. v. Arvind Malik & Ors.

01 Oct 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2923
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that a defendant can claim use and occupation charges against a plaintiff without a counterclaim if the relief arises from the plaintiff's cause of action, directing payment of admitted rent as interim relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant use and occupation charges injunction counterclaim landlord-tenant dispute

Barun Mitra v. AVP Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Ors.

01 Oct 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2922

The Delhi High Court held that all allottees must be heard by the NCLAT before finalizing insolvency settlement terms and directed urgent hearing of the petitioner's application to protect allottee rights.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency Resolution Professional National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allottee rights Insolvency proceedings

Divya Kukreja v. Chiranjiv Lal Kukreja

01 Oct 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2921

The Delhi High Court directed the daughter to pay monthly user charges to her father during her occupation of his property pending eviction and issued notice to the developer regarding her alternate flat possession.

property appeal_allowed Significant property dispute user and occupation charges possession decree father-daughter dispute

Naveen Taneja & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

01 Oct 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2919

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising therefrom following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute Section 482 CrPC

Sunil Luthra & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

01 Oct 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2918

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and proceedings based on an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute Section 482 CrPC

Aftab Alam v. Jamia Millia Islamia

01 Oct 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2414

The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Ph.D. registration where the university failed to follow prescribed procedures and had previously permitted the scholar’s employment.

academic/administrative petition_allowed Significant Ph.D. registration cancellation Ordinance IX Jamia Millia Islamia in-service scholar Board of Studies discretion

MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. KK ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH VIRAL KIRIT KUMAR DOSHI AND ANR

01 Oct 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5561

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a loan dispute governed by a valid arbitration agreement, holding service by email valid and the dispute prima facie arbitrable.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration agreement

Dr Chandra Shekhar Sahukar v. Tarun Shridhar

30 Sep 2020 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:2914

The Delhi High Court held that substantial compliance with DACP benefit directions from 25.08.2006 suffices and dismissed the contempt petition, leaving claims for earlier benefits to be pursued through proper legal remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Dynamic Assured Career Progression DACP benefits Senior Administrative Grade Recruitment Rules

Vishal Malhotra & Anr. v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

30 Sep 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2908

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's refusal to prosecute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC withdrawal of prosecution

Gulshan Kapoor v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Ors.

30 Sep 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:2910-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious and reasoned consideration of the petitioner’s GST refund claims, holding that refund on inverted duty structure must be paid to the applicant and that procedural irregularities in notices must be addressed without requiring personal appearance.

tax other Significant Deficiency Memo Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit Refund under CGST

Chand @ Chandu v. State

30 Sep 2020 · Anu Malhotra · 2020:DHC:2915

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery with a deadly weapon under Sections 392, 394, and 397 IPC, affirming that mere presence of a deadly weapon visible to the victim constitutes 'use' under Section 397 IPC and minor discrepancies in witness testimonies do not vitiate the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery Section 397 IPC deadly weapon identification parade

Dahej Standby Jetty Project Undertaking v. Petronet LNG Limited

30 Sep 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:2911

The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension to the Arbitral Tribunal to complete arbitration proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension Arbitral Tribunal time extension

Prem Kumar & Ors. v. Sh. Abhimanyu Arora

30 Sep 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:2904

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenants on landlord’s bonafide need for commercial premises, rejecting tenants’ leave to defend application and holding that licensing or alternative premises issues are irrelevant in eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bonafide requirement leave to defend

Vishal Malhotra & Ors. v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.

30 Sep 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:2909

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute

CRSC Research and Design Institute Group Co. Ltd. v. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited & Ors.

30 Sep 2020 · C. Hari Shankar · 2020:DHC:2906
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the valid termination of a contract and dismissed the petition restraining invocation of bank guarantees, emphasizing the limited scope of interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act and the independence of bank guarantees from underlying disputes.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Bank guarantees Contract termination