Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Telstra Singapore Pte Ltd.

24 Jul 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that payments received by Telstra Singapore from Indian customers for bandwidth services provided outside India do not constitute taxable royalty income under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant royalty Section 9(1)(vi) Income Tax Act Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Article 12 DTAA

M/S OM METALS RATNAKAR PVT LTD v. NBCC (INDIA) LTD

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5460

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal by directing payment of 50% of disputed maintenance charges as a compromise, without prejudice to further legal remedies.

civil appeal_allowed maintenance charges declaration suit Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC partial payment

Inderpreet Singh Gulati v. Vikas Arora

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5461

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to produce documents at the final stage of a civil suit, holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate relevancy and necessity of the documents sought.

civil petition_dismissed Order XI Rule 14 CPC Section 151 CPC production of documents relevancy and necessity

Nitin Tokas v. Joginder Singh Tokas

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5462

The High Court held that at the preliminary stage, the plaint’s valuation of suit properties must be accepted and the petitioner cannot be directed to re-value and pay additional court fee before trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant valuation of suit property court fee Order VII Rule 11 CPC preliminary stage

Anil William Thomas Proprietor of M/s 3354 / Anil William Thomas Security Agency v. Employees State Insurance Corporation

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5463

The Delhi High Court waived the deposit requirement under Section 75(2B) of the ESI Act in a case involving a disputed and allegedly fraudulent ESIC Code, allowing the petitioner to contest the demand without prepayment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75(2B) ESIC Code fraudulent allotment

Autonix Logistics and Agro Solutions Private Limited v. Vivek Contracts Pvt. Ltd.

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5464

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to admit a belated test report in a commercial recovery suit due to lack of reasonable cause for delay, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order XI Rule 1(7)(c) CPC Section 151 CPC additional evidence

Evaan Holdings Private Limited v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5468

The Delhi High Court issued notice and directed RBI to update on regulatory actions against an NBFC amid allegations of mismanagement, emphasizing limited judicial interference pending specialized tribunal proceedings.

administrative other Significant Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Non-Banking Financial Company Article 226 Writ of Mandamus

Tanya Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5466-DB

The Delhi High Court granted interim visitation rights to the mother in a child custody dispute, emphasizing the child's welfare and maintaining parental access pending final orders.

family petition_allowed habeas corpus child custody interim visitation welfare of child

Shabana v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5465-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition for a missing pregnant minor, directing medical care and custody arrangements while leaving age determination to the trial court.

constitutional petition_allowed writ petition habeas corpus minor pregnancy

M/S Avantha Holdings Limited v. The Proper Officer GST Ward 208 Zone 11 New Delhi

24 Jul 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5446-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST adjudication order rejecting the taxpayer's explanation on unbilled revenue and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a speaking order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 73(9) Show Cause Notice unbilled revenue

Ahluwalia Contracts India Limited v. Union of India

24 Jul 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:5531

Delhi High Court directs recalculation and proper payment of arbitrator fees as per Supreme Court’s ONGC Ltd. judgment and orders release of arbitral award accordingly.

arbitration petition_allowed Significant Arbitrator fees Fourth Schedule Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 39(2)

IRCON International Limited v. Tantia Construction Limited

24 Jul 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:5525

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, courts lack jurisdiction to modify or rectify arbitral awards and dismissed the petition challenging computational errors in the award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 33 Arbitral award

Pawan Kant v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

24 Jul 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:5553

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner, holding that final exoneration on merits in customs adjudication bars prosecution as the petitioner was not the beneficial owner of seized foreign currency.

criminal petition_allowed Significant beneficial owner Customs Act 1962 foreign currency seizure adjudicatory proceedings

M/S Rasoi Canteen and Caterer v. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

24 Jul 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:5543-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid in a tender, holding that tender conditions known to the bidder cannot be belatedly challenged and that the evaluation was neither arbitrary nor mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Tender process Technical Bid evaluation Arbitrariness Judicial review

Meghana T.V v. Union of India

24 Jul 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5565-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the Karnataka High Court has territorial jurisdiction over the investigation into M/s Vikram Structures Pvt. Ltd. as the cause of action and related facts arose in Karnataka.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction doctrine of forum conveniens National Company Law Tribunal Companies Act 2013

Shenzhen Jinshunyi Electronic Co. Ltd. v. Prasha Technologies Limited

24 Jul 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:5515

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of unpaid invoices as barred by limitation, holding that no valid acknowledgment of debt extended the limitation period and the defendant failed to prove goods were defective.

civil petition_dismissed Significant limitation acknowledgment of debt invoice payment defective goods

Sarvodaya Texstyle Pvt. Ltd. v. The State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi) & Ors.

24 Jul 2024 · Subramonium Prasad

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of a belated application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to recall and re-examine a witness, holding that such power cannot be used to fill lacunae or conduct a re-trial after evidence closure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall and re-examination Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque

Iqbal Khan Yusufi v. Sabeena Siddiqui

24 Jul 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:5790-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of a guardianship petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that jurisdiction lies where the minor ordinarily resides.

family appeal_dismissed Guardianship Territorial jurisdiction Ordinary residence Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Sh Ram Krishna Datta & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Jul 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6162

The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary penalty debarring ex-servicemen employees from LTC, holding no fraud or misconduct was proved and penalty imposed contrary to Inquiry Officer's findings was unsustainable.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Leave Travel Concession fraudulent claim disciplinary proceedings Inquiry Officer findings

Manish Bajaj v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

24 Jul 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5459

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from matrimonial alliance disputes under minor IPC offences following an amicable settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences