Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

M/S PLUS91 SECURITY SOLUTIONS v. NEC CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

29 Jul 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:5551-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed Plus91's appeal, upholding the setting aside of an arbitral award that granted damages for loss of profits contrary to an express exclusion clause in the MOU, holding such award vitiated by patent illegality.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Memorandum of Understanding Patent illegality Loss of profits

Danish @ Chintu v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5552

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case due to lack of substantive evidence and failure of witnesses to identify him, emphasizing that recovery alone cannot deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail recovery substantive evidence instigation

Ganga Ram Makhija @ Gulab v. Jyoti Makhija

29 Jul 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5555

The Delhi High Court upheld maintenance and litigation expenses awarded to the wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, emphasizing the husband's duty to provide financial support and rejecting the petitioner's claim of concealment of income.

family petition_dismissed Significant maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 interim maintenance capacity to earn

Parsvnath Developers Limited & Ors. v. Parsvnath Exotica Ghaziabad Flat Buyers Association & Anr.

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5583

The High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed on the petitioners' undertaking to repay the decreetal amount as per a schedule, with strict adherence mandated and coercive action reserved for defaults.

civil appeal_dismissed repayment schedule decreetal amount execution petition non-bailable warrants

Surender Singh Paul v. Savita Paul

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5584

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow a belated written statement in a matrimonial suit, emphasizing a liberal approach and limiting interference under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Family Courts Act 1984 Article 227 Constitution of India belated written statement

MS Santosh Sharma v. MS Anita Arora

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5585

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a nearly five-year delay in filing a written statement after striking off defence, emphasizing the need for finality and justifiable cause for delay.

civil petition_dismissed Order VIII Rule 1 CPC written statement striking off defence delay in filing

Rajiv Sharma v. Ajay Kumar

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5586

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging execution of possession after the appellate court vacated stay due to court fee deficiency, holding that execution courts must follow appellate directions and remedy lies before the appellate court.

civil petition_dismissed execution proceedings warrant of possession stay vacated court fee deficiency

Samrat Singh Rawat v. Poonam Rawat

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5590

The High Court allowed the petitioner one final opportunity to lead evidence in a guardianship matter subject to costs, setting aside the Family Court's order closing that right.

family appeal_allowed guardianship petition right to lead evidence closure of evidence family court

Kanchana M. Shekhar v. Avinash Shekhar

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5592

The Delhi High Court set aside a Trial Court's interim custody order after the respondent withdrew interest in enforcement and directed expeditious adjudication of pending custody modification applications.

family petition_dismissed Special Marriage Act interim custody child custody modification of custody

SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. v. SYNC IN DESIGN PVT LTD

29 Jul 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:5591

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner an additional opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness due to counsel's personal difficulty, emphasizing the fundamental right to cross-examination and the respondent's consent.

civil petition_allowed right to cross-examination civil procedure trial court discretion personal difficulty

Kirloskar Inv. & Finance Ltd. v. OAS Appolo Tubes & Steels Ltd

29 Jul 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:5542
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that once leave is granted to continue a suit under Section 446 of the Companies Act, no separate permission is required to execute the decree passed therein against a company under winding up.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 446 Companies Act 1956 winding up execution of decree leave to continue suit

Court Its Own Motion v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

29 Jul 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:5601-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking enhanced financial assistance for senior widows and elderly citizens, holding that existing government schemes are adequate and properly implemented.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation financial assistance schemes widows pension old age pension

Hariom Kaushik v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

29 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5573-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition directing interim visitation and communication arrangements between a father and his daughter amid matrimonial discord, emphasizing the child's welfare and parental rights.

family petition_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus Child custody Parental rights Marital discord

Ashish Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Jul 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5578-DB

The Delhi High Court directed an independent medical assessment of a bipolar disorder patient involuntarily admitted to rehabilitation and granted interim reliefs restoring his autonomy and control over personal affairs.

criminal other Significant Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 involuntary admission bipolar disorder rehabilitation centre

Aditya Suresh Rao Kaware v. Western Railway Recruitment Cell

29 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5538-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of visually impaired candidates as khalasi/helper, holding that both blind and low vision persons are eligible under the Ministry's 2015 Office Memorandum and rejecting the requirement of internal appeal against medical board decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant persons with disabilities low vision blindness employment rights

Vinod Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.

29 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5546-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing regularization of contractual Nursing Officers who served during COVID-19 against vacant posts, emphasizing government guidelines and rejecting the termination of their services.

labor appeal_allowed Significant contractual employment regularization Nursing Officers COVID-19 duty

Union of India and Anr. v. Yashpal Garg and Ors.

29 Jul 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5828-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's directions for timely completion of the AGMUT IAS cadre review and allowed retrospective effect to promotions delayed due to administrative inaction, reinforcing constitutional obligations of fair and timely promotion.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant cadre review retrospective promotion IAS cadre AGMUT

Ajay Kishor v. Union of India

29 Jul 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:5571-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee acquitted of criminal charges is entitled to notional promotion and pay fixation from the original promotion date, but not arrears for the period prior to joining the promoted post.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant notional promotion pay fixation seniority acquittal

D.P. KALYAN v. NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LIMITED

29 Jul 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6414
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary inquiry findings against a retired NTC officer for unauthorized incentive payments, emphasizing limited judicial review and rejecting reappreciation of evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry judicial review disciplinary proceedings incentive commission

The Central Public Information Officer v. A K Jain

26 Jul 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6036

The Delhi High Court held that third parties have a right to seek judicial records under the RTI Act despite Consumer Protection Regulations, subject to procedural safeguards and exemptions balancing transparency and privacy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005 third party access judicial records