Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
Paropkar Dealers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court permitted a company restored by the NCLT to file overdue documents under a newly issued Scheme extending the Companies Fresh Start Scheme, without deciding jurisdictional objections.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Vikas Goel and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous an appeal challenging a 15-day suspension of municipal corporation members since the suspension period expired before the next meeting.
Shivam Lakra & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's consent not to prosecute further.
The Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors. v. Sheelavohra
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside a malafide suspension imposed immediately before retirement and directed release of full pension and retiral benefits, clarifying the limited applicability of Rule 69 of the CCS (Pension) Rules.
Sharad Kumar Sinha v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed reactivation of DIN and DSC for a director disqualified due to a struck off company, enabling a fresh start under the Companies Fresh Start Scheme 2020.
Samsung India Electronics Private Limited v. Blueflux Digital Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of the commercial dispute petition between Samsung and BlueFlux by recording their amicable settlement reached through court mediation, setting aside arbitral orders and binding parties to the settlement terms.
Mohammad Mokaram v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed reactivation of the petitioner’s DIN and DSC following restoration of his company by the NCLT and permitted availing a condonation of delay scheme despite restoration orders being pronounced after the scheme’s cutoff date.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Deepak Khosla
The Delhi High Court held that loud interruptions and scandalous allegations during court proceedings constitute criminal contempt but accepted the respondent's prompt unconditional apology to dispose of the contempt petition.
Dale Robert Brown v. Vedanta Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing the petitioner to retain a laptop containing evidentiary material and directed the respondent to pay admitted dues pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ramesh Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR alleging cheating after amicable settlement between parties, imposing a welfare cost on the petitioner.
S AND S TECHNOCRATS PRIVATE LIMITED v. CLASSIC INFRASOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act despite conflicting jurisdiction clauses, and appointed the arbitrator after failure of amicable resolution.
Tarun Khanna & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties reached an amicable settlement and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Subhash v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a rape case involving a minor, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of tampering with evidence despite contradictions in the prosecutrix's statement.
Harpal Singh Chawla v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings based on a bona fide settlement reached through mediation, allowing revival if settlement terms are breached.
Balwan Singh & Anr. v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reactivation of directors’ DINs and DSCs following NCLT restoration of a struck-off company and allowed filing of overdue documents under the ROC’s condonation scheme without additional fees.
Hamilton Houseware Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging an Adjudicating Authority's order under the PML Act is not maintainable when an alternate remedy of appeal exists, directing the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal which must first decide pending applications before hearing the appeal.
Satish Chand Rajesh Kumar Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the arbitration petition with liberty to re-approach the Court later and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Major Singh Sidhu v. Indian Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's SARFAESI application as barred by limitation and affirmed the validity of the bank's auction and sale certificate, directing the petitioner to surrender possession.
Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant financial upgradations under the ACP and MACP schemes to petitioners in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court decisions, subject to any future Apex Court orders.
Hindustan Construction Company Limited v. Ircon International Limited
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by three months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, while refusing the respondent's request for a refresher hearing.