Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
Shri Ram Krishan Parmhans Shiksha Parishad v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s application to start an Ayurveda college was deemed approved under Section 13A(6) of the IMCC Act due to the Central Government’s failure to communicate a decision within one year, setting aside the subsequent rejection.
P.C. Mishra v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt and improper reliance on unreliable tape-recorded evidence and approver testimony.
Sabhya Dutta v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a vehicle accident after the parties settled amicably and the petitioner agreed to pay compensation and welfare contributions.
Delhi Tamil Education Association v. Director of Education and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that aided linguistic minority schools have constitutional and statutory autonomy to fill vacancies of Principals and teachers without prior DoE approval, setting aside the DoE’s rejection based on alleged absence of Managing Committees.
Siemens Healthcare Private Limited v. Directorate General of Health Services, Central Procurement Agency
The Delhi High Court held that minor notarization irregularities in a tender document do not justify outright disqualification and directed the tendering authority to allow the bidder to rectify such defects before rejecting the bid.
Ved Bhushan Bhatia v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of 2nd MACP benefit with arrears to the petitioner from the date of completion of 20 years of service, following its earlier ruling on the issue.
Ankur Gosain & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Bar Council of Delhi and GNCTD to verify and include all eligible advocates in the Chief Minister’s Advocates’ Welfare Scheme, ensuring effective implementation and preventing arbitrary exclusion.
Tahiliani Design Private Limited v. Joint CIT, Central Wing, Central Range-8, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that once an application under Section 245C is filed, the Settlement Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over penalty proceedings arising from the same case, quashing the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer post-application.
Suresh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's no objection.
National Internet Exchange of India v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to revise the GST TRAN-1 form to rectify bona fide errors and claim transitional credit under the CGST Act.
Imran & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences, including custody of their minor child and divorce under Shariyat.
Ravi Rakesh & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute.
Sartaj Ali v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of investigation powers under the CGST Act and dismissed the petitioner's interim relief application against ongoing investigations.
Atul Tiwari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension with arrears and interest to a petitioner similarly placed as in earlier judgments, preserving respondents' appeal rights.
Mamraj Singh Chahar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with arrears and interest, while preserving rights to further remedies.
SLSV Rama Linga Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in prior judgments, with arrears and interest, preserving rights of appeal.
Sh. N.K. Madhok v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging pension calculation and related claims, holding that review is not maintainable merely on disagreement with judicial decisions and that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for review.
Saurav Das v. Central Public Information Officer, National E-Governance Division
The Delhi High Court issued notice and sought detailed information charts in a writ petition challenging the CIC's discharge of show-cause notices relating to RTI queries on the Aarogya Setu application, emphasizing procedural fairness and public interest.
Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that parties must follow the contractually stipulated dispute resolution procedure before arbitration and that the court's role at the arbitrator appointment stage is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement's existence.