Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Mitsubishi Corporation v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle International Tax (2)(2)(1) Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has plenary powers to entertain additional grounds not raised in the return, and the AO must consider such grounds despite CBDT Circular No. 549/1989, quashing the final assessment order and directing fresh consideration.
Ajay Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to quash FIR and proceedings against a former director of Amrapali Group, holding that serious allegations in the forensic audit report justify continuation of criminal investigation despite his non-naming in the FIR or charge-sheet.
Vishal Khullar v. The State (Government of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR alleging use of forged Schengen visa, holding that delay in investigation alone does not warrant quashing and offences under IPC and Passport Act are prima facie made out.
Rajiv Jaiswal v. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that all conditions in Clause 26 of the General Insurance Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 must be cumulatively satisfied to add extra years to qualifying service, dismissing the petitioner's claim for additional pension benefits.
Bhushan Tiwari & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Jasroop Singh Sodhi v. State Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
M/S PAMPAR OVENFRESH FOODS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's decision to recover grant-in-aid from a food processing unit damaged by fire, holding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate adequate progress or exceptional circumstances to justify extension or prevent recovery under the scheme.
Dharmveer alias Dharmbir and Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under minor IPC offences following an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Elochukwu Collins v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a foreign national accused in a commercial quantity heroin case, holding substantial compliance with Section 42 NDPS Act and applying stringent bail conditions under Section 37.
Sukhbir @ Bhola v. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the accused in a sexual assault case involving a minor, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, prima facie evidence, and risk of fleeing justice.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Prabhat Kishan Bhat
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for injuries sustained due to rash and negligent driving, affirming the assessment of damages and interest rate.
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. M/S BCC Developers and Promoters Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the application to set aside the arbitral award was barred by limitation as the appellant failed to file within the prescribed period despite exclusion of time spent in courts lacking jurisdiction under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Rajiv Bajaj and Anr v. Suruchi Bhasin @ Suruchi Bajaj and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a mediated Settlement Agreement, dismissing the appellants' attempt to retract after partial performance and non-disclosure of material facts.
Irvinder Kaur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the expired 'GARNISH' trademark from the Register due to non-renewal within the statutory grace period under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Kartik Rastogi & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from a property possession dispute under Sections 323, 354, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Irvinder Kaur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition directing removal of the 'GARNISH' trademark from the register due to non-renewal beyond the statutory grace period under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Irvinder Kaur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition directing removal of the expired trademark 'GARNISH GOLD' from the register due to non-renewal within the statutory period under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Sanjay Gupta v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Ward 45, Zone 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a GST Show Cause Notice under an inaccessible portal category does not constitute valid service, setting aside the order and remanding for fresh adjudication.
Irvinder Kaur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition directing removal of the expired trademark 'GARNISH GOLD' from the Register of Trade Marks as the statutory renewal period had lapsed.
Irvinder Laur Chadha v. Garnish Electronics Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition directing removal of the 'GARNISH' trademark from the register due to non-renewal beyond the statutory grace period under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.