Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Jaiveer Singh Virk v. Sir Sobha Singh & Sons Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the civil suit seeking enforcement of a family settlement and Board Resolution against a family-owned company, holding that such shareholder disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the NCLT and are not maintainable in civil courts without specific pleadings.
C & C Constructions Ltd. v. Ircon International Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's summary dismissal of the appellant's claims barred by contract clause 49.[5], affirming limited judicial interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Bhopal Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal without inquiry of a DDA employee for serious misconduct creating an atmosphere of fear, affirming the authority’s power under Regulation 30(2) and Article 311(2)(b) to dispense with inquiry when it is not reasonably practicable.
Gaurav Kaushik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to proceed expeditiously with recording the evidence of threatened witnesses after ordering protective measures under the Witness Protection Scheme, thereby balancing witness safety with the need to avoid trial delays.
Deepak Kumar v. Meenu Sirohi
The High Court set aside the Family Court's decree of nullity, holding that the respondent failed to prove coercion or lack of consent to annul the marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act.
CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SARITA MULTIPLEXES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the parties' commercial disputes and permitted the petitioner to file an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the arbitrator, directing interim orders to continue pending arbitration.
BISWAJIT ROY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging only show cause notices issued by Sashastra Seema Bal are premature and directed that termination orders, if passed, be stayed for two weeks to enable statutory appeals under Rule 29 of the SSB Rules, 2009.
Business Standard Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Lohitaksha Shukla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a defamation complaint and summoning order for lack of locus of the complainant as a 'person aggrieved' under Section 199 CrPC and absence of prima facie offence under Sections 499 and 500 IPC.
Hero Motocorp Limited v. M S Deep Automobiles & Anr.
The Delhi High Court referred a contractual dispute under a dealership agreement to arbitration and directed appointment of an arbitrator due to the respondents' failure to respond or participate.
Manish Kumar v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court set aside the NCDRC's order condoning delay beyond the statutory period for filing a written version under the Consumer Protection Act, holding such delay condonation without reasons and jurisdiction is illegal.
Parveen Kumar v. M/S Poonam Securities Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside an order appointing a receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act after the parties amicably settled their loan dispute and the vehicle was returned.
Jagat Ram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.
Saleem v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging the discharge of two accused due to vague allegations, affirming the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction in interference with discharge orders.
Saleem v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of two accused from dowry harassment and murder charges due to vague allegations and lack of supporting evidence, emphasizing the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction at the charge framing stage.
Vinod Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the method of fixing inter se seniority of ITBP Assistant Commandants promoted through LDCE by combining marks of the LDCE and Basic Professional Course, dismissing the petition challenging the seniority list.
EX HC GD HANUMAN PRASAD v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with Supreme Court and Division Bench precedents within twelve weeks.
CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SARITA MULTIPLEXES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Cinepolis India Pvt. Ltd. and Sarita Multiplexes Pvt. Ltd., permitting a Section 17 application before the arbitrator and continuing interim orders.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. M/S Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order rejecting the Revenue's addition under Section 56(2)(viib), holding that valuation by a prescribed expert using the DCF method cannot be disregarded merely because actual results differ from projections.
Ajay Kumar Saroj & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Ram Krishna & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.