Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Raj Singh & Anr. v. Om Prakash Lakra & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to admit additional documents at the final arguments stage in a partition suit due to unexplained delay and potential prejudice to defendants.
Kishan Kumar & Anr v. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that service by registered post and publication in a local newspaper was valid and failure to seek leave to defend warranted eviction.
Harish Kumar & Anr. v. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that summons served by registered post and publication after affixation constituted valid service, and the tenant's failure to seek leave to defend led to deemed admission of eviction grounds.
Gagan Deep Dugal & Ors. v. Religare Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act is maintainable only after permission is granted, and limitation for filing reply starts thereafter, dismissing the petition challenging NCDRC's refusal of interim relief and condemning repeated petitions as abuse of process.
Ashwin Mittal v. Kanika Gupta Mittal
The High Court directed the Trial Court to fix dates for recording respondent's evidence simultaneously with pending applications to avoid delay in a divorce proceeding under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Shri Sukhlal Jain v. Shri Brij Bhushan Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of the petitioner's evidence by the Trial Court, holding that delay and acquiescence disentitled the petitioner from relief under Article 227.
Mangalam Traders v. Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax Department of Trade and Taxes and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a dealer is entitled to statutory interest on delayed VAT refunds under Sections 38 and 42 of the DVAT Act, rejecting the tax department's denial of interest despite investigations and legal disputes.
Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mr. Hitanshu Mishra and Mr. Rachit Gupta v. Bhanupriya Shokeen
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing appointment of a candidate as TGT (English), ruling that eligibility conditions in Recruitment Rules cannot be retrospectively altered by corrigendum issued after recruitment.
M/S A P ENTERPRISES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II /AVATO, WARD-83, ZONE-7, DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to vague Show Cause Notice and violation of natural justice, directing restoration of registration.
Senbo Engineering Limited v. New Era Projects & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to entertain a review application filed after an unexplained delay of five years, upholding the decree against the petitioner.
Bank of Baroda v. Sh Lakshman Shetty
Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction under Article 227 when the cause of action arose outside its territory and permitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. SHASHANK SINGH TOMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of contractual Welfare Officers with continuous service over ten years against sanctioned posts, applying the principles of Uma Devi and related Supreme Court precedents.
Sudhir Kumar & Anr. v. M/S Escorts Kubota Ltd.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to defer the matter but granted one last opportunity to cross-examine a witness subject to costs to balance fairness and timely disposal.
Aabid Ali & Ors. v. State Through SHO P.S. Sonia Vihar & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
The Union of India v. Vittal Rathla
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing consideration of promotion claims of eligible employees despite ongoing cadre review and administrative delays, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Union of India & Anr. v. Ved Prakash
The Delhi High Court quashed Tribunal orders granting MACP benefits based on a non-precedential Supreme Court dismissal but directed the petitioners to release the respondent’s pension and retiral benefits without recovery.
MYPREFERRED TRANSFORMATION AND HOSPITALITY PVT LTD v. HOTEL SUPREME
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension to the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondent.
National Highways Authority of India v. Madurai Tuticorin Expressways Ltd
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by nine months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Zimmer India Pvt Ltd v. AhujaSons Surgicals
The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
RVR Infrastructure Ltd v. Sanjhi Exim Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld its crystallized payment order in an arbitration-related dispute, ruling that the petitioner discharged its liabilities despite conflicting interest calculations, and dismissed the petition.