Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Neelam @ Geeta v. Rakesh Kumar Sharma & Anr

01 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6152

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's applications for condonation of delay and restoration of appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, emphasizing the need for bona fide explanation and diligent prosecution.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay restoration of appeal sufficient cause Section 5 Limitation Act

Shakti Metals v. The Commissioner Central Goods and Services Tax and Ors

01 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5737-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration imposed without due process and restored the petitioner’s registration, emphasizing the need for specific allegations and opportunity to respond.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation show cause notice principles of natural justice temporary suspension of business

Heirs and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

01 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5956-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking possession and compensation for land acquired in 1958, holding the claim barred by limitation and affirming the finality of acquisition proceedings completed decades ago.

property petition_dismissed Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Article 226 Limitation Compensation

Dharmender Singh v. Asgar Imam & Ors

01 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:5646
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing the functional disability assessment from 32% to 64%, emphasizing proper evaluation of disability in light of the claimant's occupation and earning capacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement functional disability permanent disability

Jabbar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5678

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Rajesh Sachdeva v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5722

The Delhi High Court set aside the order releasing seized bank funds to the complainant without issuing a show-cause notice or recording findings under Section 107 BNSS, directing the amount to remain deposited pending investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 Section 107 BNSS seizure of property proceeds of crime

Dharmender Kumar @ Dharmender Singh and Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) and Anr

01 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:5819

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

M/S ALIBABA ENTERPRISES v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS-II/AVATO WARD - 83, DELHI

01 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5657-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires clear reasons and prior proposal in the Show Cause Notice, and modified the cancellation order to be effective prospectively.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Show Cause Notice principles of natural justice

Sunita Kohli and Anr v. Kuldeep Singh Sejwal

01 Aug 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:5665

The High Court allowed the petition under Article 227 to set aside the Trial Court's closure of the petitioners' evidence, granting a final opportunity to lead evidence subject to costs and strict conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction closure of evidence adjournment

Nandita v. National Testing Agency and Ors.

01 Aug 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:5843

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging NEET (UG)-2024 answer keys for two questions, holding that courts must defer to expert opinions unless errors are manifestly incorrect.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant NEET (UG)-2024 answer key challenge judicial review subject experts

Convent of Jesus & Mary v. Amar Jyoti Brahamchari & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5830-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that an unaided minority school cannot recover excess retiral payments from a retired teacher if such recovery causes undue hardship, affirming statutory protections under the DSEAR Act and principles of equity.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant recovery of excess payments unaided minority school Delhi School Education Act 1973 Section 10(1)

Indian Council of Medical Research v. Shri Uday Kumar Singh

01 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:5709-DB

The Delhi High Court held that regularization of service is a continuous cause of action and dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order, directing adjudication on merits despite limitation objections.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization of service limitation continuous cause of action Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Charles and Keith International Pte Ltd v. Ambud Sharma & Anr.

01 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5762

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration in Class 09 for 'C&K' due to prior use and non-use by the respondent, directing rectification of the trademark register.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Trade Marks Act, 1999 Trademark registration Proposed to be used basis Cancellation of trademark

Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Mr. Sunny Sachdeva Trading as M/s Hache Shirts & Ors.

01 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5761

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Calvin Klein Trademark Trust against defendants dealing in counterfeit goods bearing its registered trademarks and copyrights, after defendants failed to contest the suit.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed trademark infringement copyright infringement permanent injunction passing off

TATA SIA AIRLINES LIMITED & ANR. v. ASHRAF ALAM

01 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5760

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining a former employee from defaming or disparaging the well-known trademark 'VISTARA' after he deleted the alleged defamatory social media posts.

civil appeal_allowed permanent injunction defamation disparagement well-known trademark

M/S MARVEL TEA ESTATE INDIA LTD. v. M/S NUSUN GENETIC RESERCH LTD.

01 Aug 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:5759

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the plaintiff restraining the defendant from using the deceptively similar mark 'NUSUN MARVEL' in relation to Class 30 and 31 goods, upholding trademark infringement and passing off claims.

civil appeal_allowed trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction registered trademark

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. Narcotics Control Bureau

01 Aug 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5649
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention and prima facie assessment of evidence justify bail despite the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS prolonged incarceration

Mukesh Kumar Prajapati v. Narcotic Control Bureau

01 Aug 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5652
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the need to balance statutory bail restrictions with prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Section 52A NDPS bail

Mukesh Kumar Prajapati v. Narcotic Control Bureau

01 Aug 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:5651
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and requiring prima facie satisfaction despite stringent statutory bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act Section 52A NDPS Act bail

Rajesh Narula and Ors v. Danesh Mehta

01 Aug 2024 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2024:DHC:5725

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of an undisputed Hindu Will without probate, granting declaration, partition, and injunction in favor of legal heirs as per the Will's terms.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will validity Partition suit Doctrine of election Section 58 Indian Evidence Act