Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi v. Dabur Research Foundation
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that reopening of assessment under Section 147 was unjustified as the assessee had complied with Rule 5D(4) by furnishing donation details before original assessment, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
GENESTORE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR. v. SPICE HEALTHCARE PVT LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of multiple agreements between the parties, deleted non-parties from proceedings, and referred pre-arbitral interim relief applications to arbitration.
Resoursys Telecom and Anr. v. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti
The Delhi High Court held that smartphones fall within the "same or similar category products" as tablets under the tender conditions and quashed the arbitrary disqualification of the petitioners' bid by Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti.
Preet Singh v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences related to an unauthorized protest and alleged communal incitement, holding that the question of offence under Section 153-A IPC requires trial and the petitioner was no longer needed for custodial interrogation.
Ravinder v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the petitioner’s retirement from BSF service on grounds of unsuitability, holding the decision fair and reasonable despite procedural contentions.
Akash Akhil & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order and remanded the case for fresh consideration of whether MCA qualification is equivalent to the prescribed 'A' level course for appointment as TGT (Computer Science).
M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LIMITED v. M/S GOLDEN TOBIE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the trademark license agreement was not inherently determinable and disputes arising therefrom were arbitrable, but dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction due to invalid termination notice and lack of prima facie case.
Seema Devi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension and family pension to the widow of an ex-serviceman similarly placed as in precedent cases, with interest on delayed arrears.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT. LTD. v. LENSKART SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve lease-related disputes between OYO Hotels and Lenskart Solutions.
Dhruba Narayan Brahma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension with arrears to a petitioner similarly placed as in prior judgments, preserving rights of appeal and mandating interest on delayed payments.
Aarti Sharma v. Kunal Bhagi
The Delhi High Court revised interim maintenance upwards by excluding pensioner parents from dependents and applying the correct apportionment of the respondent's income between the parties.
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (INDIA) LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX
The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner cannot block issuance of Form 'F' without a reasoned order after hearing, and directed restoration of the petitioner's online facility.
M/S K.S. JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a contract dispute after the petitioner validly invoked arbitration.
Krishan Kumar Dabas v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to decide pay fixation and arrears claims of petitioners promoted to Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) from the date of promotion despite administrative delays in joining, without expressing opinion on merits.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Anju Sharma
The Delhi High Court recorded the lawful settlement between parties in connected civil appeals, disposed of the appeals accordingly, and directed the Trial Court to take the settlement on record and pass consequential orders including refund of court fees.
S.P. Singla Constructions Private Limited v. Construction and Design Services, Uttar Pradesh
Delhi High Court dismissed petition for appointment of arbitrator holding that the arbitration seat is Lucknow as per contract, and only courts at Lucknow have jurisdiction.
Anil Bansal & Ors. v. Rajender Kumar Returning Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Returning Officer to decide the petitioners' representations regarding his appointment and election process expeditiously, without quashing the appointment or postponing the election.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Rajneesh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier cases, with interest on delayed arrears and provision for written reasons if denied.
Lakshmi Narayan Sahu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension arrears and future payments to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, preserving procedural safeguards and interest on delayed payments.