Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
G4S PLC v. G4 EXCELLENCE MANAGEMENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to G4S Plc. against G4 Excellence for trademark infringement and passing off of deceptively similar marks and domain names.
Jitender Gupta v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Registrar's sanction for prosecution against the petitioner based on an enquiry under Section 62 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, dismissing the writ petition for suppression of material documents and holding no separate enquiry was required under Rule 158.
ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding that the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the contract vests jurisdiction with the Guwahati courts and that the arbitration venue clause specifying New Delhi does not confer jurisdiction on Delhi courts.
M/S Pooja Infotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. M/S Prabhuprem Infotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act, holding that limitation and arbitrability issues are to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal unless claims are manifestly barred.
Maj. Gen. Manjit Singh Sandhu & Anr. v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from real estate sale agreements where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Overeas Drilling Limitd v. Directorate General of Hydrocarbons of India
The Delhi High Court held that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration Act applies only in absence of explicit direction in the Award, and interest on costs requires specific grant by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Vikash Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension arrears with interest to the petitioner if similarly placed as in prior judgments, or communicate reasons for denial.
Pankaj Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF to decide the petitioners' challenge to recruitment rules and creation of posts as a representation within twelve weeks, without adjudicating the merits.
Shri Sikander Raja v. The State
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a matrimonial dispute case, emphasizing his non-involvement in rape and cooperation with investigation, subject to strict conditions.
Abul Kalam @ Sultan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a drug trafficking accused under the NDPS Act, holding that sufficient material existed to deny bail under Section 37 due to his involvement in a commercial quantity drug syndicate and risk of reoffending.
BSR v. PSR
The Delhi High Court set aside an appellate order dismissing domestic violence appeals for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for a reasoned de novo hearing.
Navdeep Singh Rawat v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate appointment, holding that eligibility is governed by the policy prevailing at the time of application consideration, and delay or earlier unmarried status does not entitle age relaxation.
Nidhu @ Sheela v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of absconding despite advanced trial stage.
BSR v. PSR
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellate court’s dismissal of domestic violence appeals for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.
Ahshan Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a father-in-law accused of raping his daughter-in-law, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of victim intimidation.
Jagbir Singh Kaushik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a BSF officer, holding that the inquiry complied with court directions and the disciplinary action was justified and non-vindictive.
DELHI BUILDTECH PVT. LTD v. M/S. SATYA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator appointed unilaterally by an ineligible Managing Director is void ab initio, mandating termination of the arbitrator's mandate and appointment of a new arbitrator.
Mithun Bhatnagar v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a large-scale industrial plot allotment fraud case after investigation completion and charge-sheet filing, imposing conditions to safeguard trial integrity.
Sarvdeep Garg v. Almond Infrabuild Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial petition following a court-facilitated settlement agreement, binding the parties and rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
Mithun Bhatnagar v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of economic offences involving fraudulent allotment of industrial plots, emphasizing completed investigation, documentary evidence, and imposing conditions to safeguard trial integrity.