M/S Sahara India v. M/S M C Aggarwal (HUF)

Delhi High Court · 21 Oct 2021 · 2021:DHC:4488
Prathiba M. Singh
EX.F.A.18/2019 & CM APPL.20351/2019
2021:DHC:4488
civil settled

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal challenging an execution order as settled following a binding mediation agreement between the landlord and tenant.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.F.A.18/2019& CM APPL.20351/2019
M/S SAHARA INDIA Appellant
Through; Ms.Neha Gupta,Advocate
VERSUS
M/S M C AGGARWAL(HUF) Respondent
Through: Mr.PK Agrawal,Mr.Rishabh Tomar, Advocates
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M.SINGH
21.10.2021
ORDER

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. This matter has been taken up today as IS'^ October, 2021 was declared holiday.

3. The present appeal was filed challenging the impugned order dated 22*^^ February,2019passed by the Id.ADJ,Tis Hazari Courts,New Delhi,in Execution Petition 123762/2016 titled M/s MC Aggarwal(HUF) v. M/s Sahara India & Ors.

4. The background is that the Respondent- M/s M. C. Aggarwal (HUF)/owner (hereinafter "Respondent") had given premises bearing NO. 817-A,Amba Deep Building, 14-Kasturba Gandhi Marg,New Delhi to the Appellant- M/s Sahara India {hereinafter "Appellant"). The lease had expired by efflux oftime. A civil suit was filed by the Respondent which was decreed by judgment dated Ib'^ May, 2011, passed by the Ld. ADJ (Central), Delhi. The execution petition was, thereafter, filed by the Respondent. In the execution proceedings, attachment order was passed by 2021:DHC:4488 the impugned order dated IT^ February 2019. As per the owner,the dues were approximately Rs. 7,00,000/-. However, as per the tenant, the dues were only Rs.4,78,605/-.

5. This Court had referred the matter to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide order dated 6^^ January,2021.

6. The matter has now been settled as per the settlement agreement placed on record by the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre dated 20^ July, 2021. As per the said settlement agreement, parties have agreed to fully and finally settle the disputes with payment ofRs.3,50,000/by the Appellantto the Respondent.

7. The settlement agreement records that the said amount has already been paid on 13^ May,2021 vide RTGS to the Respondent.The settlement agreement is signed by the Mediator, who has also attached the consent emails sent by both parties along with the settlement agreement. The emails have been sent by Mr.J.B. Roy,partner at the Appellant-firm and Mr.P.K. Agrawal,Karta ofthe Respondent-HUF.

8. Considering the terms of the settlement, nothing survives in the present appeal, the parties shall be bound by the terms and conditions contained in the settlement agreement.

9. The appeal, along with any pending applications, is disposed of as being settled between the parties. a tLatLih.. PRATHIBA M.SINGH,J. OCTOBER 21,2021 MR/MS