Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
M/S ERA-PATEI-ADVANCE(JV) v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a commercial petition following amicable settlement between the parties and disposed of all pending applications as infructuous.
Santra Devi v. Paramjit Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the executing court's order issuing possession warrants in a possession suit, holding that title objections not raised in the original suit cannot obstruct execution, and possession shall vest with the court pending objections by the Delhi Development Authority.
Simplex Infrastructures Limited v. Director General Married Accommodation Project
The Delhi High Court referred the commercial dispute between Simplex Infrastructures Limited and the Director General Married Accommodation Project to arbitration before a retired Supreme Court judge, allowing interim relief to continue pending arbitration.
Sarthak Khandelwal and Ors. v. Air India Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Air India's Career Progression Policy requiring pilots to clear ALTP papers by cut-off dates for seniority and command training, upholding the employer's managerial prerogative.
Convergytics Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Randhir Hebbar & Ors.
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction over a defamation and business interference suit involving internet publication, dismissed defendants' plea to reject plaint, and granted interim injunction restraining defamatory acts.
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED v. HINDUSTAN OIL EXPLORATION CORPORATION LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to extend the Arbitral Tribunal’s mandate by six months under Section 29A(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from respondents.
Shubham Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that an order refusing early hearing of writ petitions by a Single Judge is not appealable by Letters Patent Appeal and dismissed the appeals accordingly.
M/S OK PLAY INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S A.P. DISTRIBUTORS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld its order setting aside the Commercial Court's condonation of delay in filing a belated written statement without proper application and procedural compliance in a commercial suit.
Centre for Development of Telematics v. Xalted Information Systems Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator with 40% fee entitlement and extended the arbitral mandate following the death of the original arbitrator during ongoing arbitration proceedings.
Abdul Majid and Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Labour and CGIT to upgrade video conferencing infrastructure and appoint additional Presiding Officers to ensure smooth functioning of the tribunal.
Shubham Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. NDMC
The Delhi High Court dismissed Letters Patent Appeals challenging an order declining early hearing of writ petitions, holding such orders are not appealable and transfer requests must be made before the Single Judge.
Rajni Raheja v. Satish Kumar Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit by decreeing it in terms of a recorded settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
EX. HC/GD Jagdish Prasad v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the petitioners' claims for second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court judgments, disposing of the writ petitions with a time-bound mandate.
Vishwanath C Bahaddur v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Navy to verify and grant pro rata pension and arrears to petitioners similarly placed as in prior judgments, with interest on delayed payments and procedural safeguards for denial.
Dr. Paramjit Singh Nagi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to decide the petitioner's pending representations on Non Practicing Allowance within twelve weeks without adjudicating the substantive claims.
Gopal Taneja v. SDM, Sub Division Kotwali Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court clarified that SDMs cannot mandate a uniform affidavit format for asset disclosure in execution proceedings, overruling earlier judgments prescribing such formats.
Lokesh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that medical fitness for recruitment in paramilitary forces is to be determined by the Forces' doctors, and their opinion prevails over conflicting reports from other hospitals absent mala fide.
Deccan Holdings B V v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to a 5% withholding tax rate on dividend income under the India-Netherlands DTAA read with the MFN clause, setting aside the Assessing Officer's order applying 10%.
DR RUCHITA GHILORIA & ORS. v. MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed modification of the No Objection Certificate format to ensure clear procedural compliance and prevent delays in granting study leave and admission to postgraduate medical courses.
Awanish Kumar Mishra v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Rs. 344 Crore economic offence case, holding that gravity of offence alone cannot deny bail when investigation is complete and no risk of evidence tampering exists.