Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Love Chauhan v. Ajay Kumar Kathuria
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to condone delay in filing written statement beyond 120 days in a commercial suit, holding pandemic-related extension orders do not apply to extend condonation periods once statutory limits expire.
Sudhanshu Sharma v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondents amended regulations to recognize the three-year integrated B.Ed.-M.Ed. degree for teacher appointments, subject to a bridge course.
Parminder Pal Singh v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to expeditiously consider representations for evacuation of stranded persons from Afghanistan but declined to issue mandamus due to lack of sufficient proof.
J K Tyre and Industries Ltd. v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that freezing orders under the PMLA based on foreign letters of request must comply with domestic procedural safeguards, including disclosure of reasons and documents, and be limited to specific amounts involved.
Varun Katiyar v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to join a pending writ petition involving similar issues to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Scoop Brand Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. M/S Adgour Decorator
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed factual issues regarding conditional cheque presentation must be decided by the trial court and not at the quashing stage.
M/S. E-QUBE CONSULTANTS v. VLCC HEALTHCARE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed an arbitration petition as withdrawn after the parties settled their disputes amicably.
Umesh Verma v. State
Bail was denied to the accused in a cryptocurrency chit fund fraud case due to prima facie evidence of cheating, flight to Dubai, and risk of tampering with evidence.
Hemlata Mathur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to implement a Rajasthan High Court judgment in favor of petitioners on an identical issue, refusing to remit the matter to the tribunal.
Gyan Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that SC/ST employees promoted by reservation are entitled to consequential seniority under the OM dated 21.01.2002 implementing Article 16(4A), setting aside the Tribunal's application of the catch-up rule.
Piyush Kumar Singh v. NTPC Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of training period from post-qualification experience and dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of appointment for the post of Experienced Engineer.
Airone Charters Pvt Ltd v. Jetsetgo Aviation Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw arbitration appeals to re-approach the Arbitral Tribunal, dismissing the appeals as withdrawn.
Vivek Slaria v. Neeraj Tyagi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve partnership disputes where parties failed to agree on an arbitrator.
Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited v. Dhani Loans and Services Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement between a garment retailer and an NBFC.
Vibhuti Thakur v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against a private contractor and public servants for criminal conspiracy and corruption in a government tender, emphasizing the sufficiency of prima facie material at the charge framing stage.
TATA Sons Private Limited v. Hakunamatata Tata Founders & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere accessibility of a foreign defendant's website in India without overt intent to target Indian customers does not confer territorial jurisdiction for trademark infringement claims.
SIVANSSH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. v. ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANIZATION
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party is impermissible and appointed a sole arbitrator under Sections 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to ensure impartial dispute resolution.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT. LTD. v. ZREYAH SEMICONDUCTORS PVT LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Vendor Agreement after amicable settlement efforts failed.
Sanjay Singh; Suraj Singh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to applicants in an SC/ST Act case, holding that bail is maintainable if prima facie ingredients of the offence are not established, particularly regarding the requirement of insult in a place within public view.
Ramesh Chand Tanwar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 354, 506, and 509 IPC, holding that delay in FIR filing with reasonable explanation is not fatal and the FIR discloses cognizable offences warranting investigation.