Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Zydus Takeda Healthcare Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6180

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing grant of MEIS benefits to the petitioner, holding that inadvertent procedural errors rectified under Section 149 Customs Act cannot justify denial of export incentives.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Merchandise Export from India Scheme MEIS benefits Section 149 Customs Act shipping bill amendment

M/S Saraswati Trading Company v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5982-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cancellation cannot be applied retrospectively without proper compliance and directed reconsideration of cancellation effective from the date applied by the taxpayer.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation CGST Act 2017 KYC documents

Renu Bala & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

09 Aug 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5951

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 338/2016 and transfer of investigation, holding that disputed factual allegations require trial and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR abuse of process police misconduct

Ajay Sondhi @ Dimpy v. State of Delhi

09 Aug 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5952

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 308 and 324 IPC due to contradictions in prosecution evidence and flawed investigation, granting benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 324 IPC Benefit of doubt Contradictory evidence

Satpal Singh Palli & Anr v. State & Anr

09 Aug 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5950

The Delhi High Court quashed the criminal complaint against former directors of a company who had resigned before the alleged SEBI Act offences occurred, holding they cannot be held liable under Section 27 of the SEBI Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 27 SEBI Act Form-32 resignation limitation Section 468 CrPC quashing complaint

Rama Mishra v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

09 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6015

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Dr. Priyanshu Raj v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:5984-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a foreign medical graduate debarred from NEET PG 2024 for providing false information and upheld the binding penalty imposed by the Examinations Ethics Committee.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NEET PG Foreign Medical Graduate Examination FMGE Medical Council Registration

Vaibhav v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Aug 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:5972-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging an order remanding juvenility inquiry, holding it interlocutory and infructuous as the petitioner had opportunity to be heard in the subsequent inquiry.

criminal petition_dismissed juvenile justice juvenility determination remand for fresh inquiry revision petition

Sarbjit Singh v. Anil Kumar Dhupar and Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:5997

The Delhi High Court upheld fixation of use and occupation charges at Rs. 25,000 per month payable by the tenant post eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, rejecting the tenant's lower rent claim and area dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 use and occupation charges eviction order market rent

Meenu Gupta & others v. Om Prakash

09 Aug 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:5998

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement by the landlord, recognizing ownership through oral family partition and rejecting the tenant's challenge to landlordship and bona fide need.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship

Dinesh Mittal & Ors. v. M/S Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd

09 Aug 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:5983

The Delhi High Court upheld the Official Liquidator’s authority to sell company land assets in liquidation, rejecting allottees’ claims for allotment and directing government officials to comply with compensation disbursement orders.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding-up Official Liquidator land sale Sector 78 Faridabad

Vedpal Sheetal Chaudhary v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Aug 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5977-DB

The Delhi High Court directed administrative authorities to expeditiously consider representations regarding flawed drainage causing waterlogging, closing the writ petition without adjudicating on merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Procedural public interest litigation drainage system waterlogging administrative action

Savalia Rajan v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5976-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the debarment of a candidate from NEET PG 2024 for serious misrepresentation in NEET PG 2023 application, affirming the Ethics Committee's extended penalty.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NEET PG debarment unfair means misrepresentation

Sri Awadh Ram Leela Committee Vashnu Mata Mandir v. Delhi Municipal Corporation

09 Aug 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:5975-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that there is no fundamental right to insist on organizing Ram Leela on a particular land and that the statutory authorities have fulfilled their duty by allotting available land.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Fundamental right Article 25 Article 26 Religious freedom

Usha v. Kanta

09 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5906

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery of a friendly loan without fixed repayment time is barred by limitation three years from the date the loan was advanced, not from the date of demand.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation period money lent payable on demand Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Kirti Gupta v. Vinay Kumar Aggarwal & Ors

09 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:5914
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, affirming contributory negligence against the appellant for allowing her minor son to drive without a license and confirming the compensation quantum based on assessed functional disability.

motor_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant contributory negligence minor driving vehicle functional disability motor accident compensation

Smriti Bhatia v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

09 Aug 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:5947

Delhi High Court directed the MCD to effectively enforce demolition orders against unauthorized construction, emphasizing its statutory duty and the Court's writ jurisdiction to prevent municipal abdication.

administrative petition_allowed Significant unauthorized construction demolition order Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Section 343 DMC Act

Sundari Gautam v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 Aug 2024 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2024:DHC:5944

The Delhi High Court held that the offences under sections 3 and 5 of the POCSO Act apply to offenders of any gender, dismissed the revision petition challenging framing of charge against a female accused, and ruled that delay in FIR registration does not warrant discharge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act aggravated penetrative sexual assault gender-neutral interpretation delay in FIR registration

Genpact Luxembourg S.A.R.L. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi

08 Aug 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6011-DB

Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices for AY 2018-19 against Genpact Luxembourg holding that reopening requires valid reasons in original notice and liability for Dividend Distribution Tax lies with the declaring company, not the income recipient.

tax petition_allowed Significant reassessment Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 148A notice Dividend Distribution Tax

Pawan Kumar v. Union of India

08 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:5946-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing grant of Non-Functional Financial Upgradation to a BSF officer posted in static Law Branch locations by relaxing mandatory field service requirements in public interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Mandatory Field Service Relaxation of service conditions Border Security Force