Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Aristoplast Products Private Limited v. Energy Efficiency Services Limited
The Delhi High Court referred the appointment of the respondent’s arbitrator to DIAC under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the respondent failed to appoint within the stipulated time.
RGV Infratech Pvt Ltd v. Indian Bank Erstwhile Allahabad Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking loan restructuring under RBI circular 11.02.2020, holding that accounts declared NPA before restructuring application are ineligible and such disputes must be pursued before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on res judicata grounds, confirming compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on the ground of res judicata, affirming that compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act had been conclusively established.
Sachin Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Dedicated Freight Corridors Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that employees eligible for promotion under the old policy have a vested right to be promoted to newly created posts as a one-time measure, and the revised promotion policy requiring a CBT applies only prospectively.
BACARDI AND COMPANY LIMITED v. BAHETY OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from using the "FREEZ" mark and bottle shape, holding them prima facie infringing the plaintiff's registered "BREEZER" trademarks and trade dress.
VANSH ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES PVT LTD v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court quashed a suo moto property tax assessment order against a tenant for lack of liability and absence of prior show cause notice, allowing the petition and permitting fresh proceedings against the property owner.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on res judicata grounds, confirming compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act and barring re-litigation.
Rahul Vashishtha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging adverse UN mission appraisal remarks, holding no mala fide or procedural irregularity in the performance report affecting service benefits.
DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI MODAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS LTD v. DELHI JAL BOARD
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator unilaterally appointed without the other party's written consent is ineligible and void, terminating his mandate and appointing a new arbitrator.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of retrenchment claims on the ground of res judicata, affirming that compliance with Section 25F and prior adjudication bars re-litigation.
Kuber Enterprises v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain invocation of unconditional bank guarantees, reaffirming that such guarantees can only be interdicted in exceptional cases of egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice.
Kuber Enterprises v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against invocation of unconditional bank guarantees, reaffirming that such guarantees are independent contracts and can only be restrained in exceptional cases of egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice.
Mukesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act based on the consistent testimony of a minor victim despite absence of corroborative medical evidence.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of workmen's claims on retrenchment, holding that compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act was established and the issue was barred by res judicata.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on the ground of res judicata, affirming compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Rajinder Prasad Arora & Ors. v. Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants interim reliefs enforcing a mediated Family Settlement over company assets, affirming civil court jurisdiction despite Section 430 Companies Act objections.
Anil Kumar B.N v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with interest on arrears and preservation of appeal rights.
Eapen P.V. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's delayed representation against adverse performance appraisal within three weeks to ensure fair consideration before promotion.
Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the medical unfitness declaration of a candidate for ITBP Constable (Driver) based on defective colour perception, holding that the medical examination was properly conducted.