Delhi High Court
75,670 judgments
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on the ground of res judicata, holding that compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act had been conclusively adjudicated and the issue could not be re-agitated.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Labour Court orders rejecting retrenchment claims on res judicata grounds, upholding prior findings of compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of retrenchment claims on the ground of res judicata, affirming that compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act had been finally adjudicated.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of workmen's claims on the ground of res judicata, affirming that retrenchment complied with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act and the issue had attained finality.
Rajesh Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment and back wages due to the petitioner's inordinate delay and laches, emphasizing that delay defeats equity in service matters.
Ketan Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the 25-year age limit for issuance of CW certificates to wards of ex-servicemen, ruling that policy decisions on age limits for reservation benefits are subject to limited judicial review and are not arbitrary merely because they differ from age relaxations in other categories.
Nadeem Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 and IPC, holding that the allegations prima facie disclose cognizable offences and the FIR cannot be quashed on grounds of malafide or previous FIRs.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of workmen's claims on retrenchment compliance grounds, holding the issue barred by res judicata following prior adjudication under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
HDFC Bank v. Deepti Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that an exclusive jurisdiction clause favoring Mumbai courts in an employment contract does not oust the jurisdiction of Delhi courts where the employee resides and cause of action arises, especially to avoid hardship to the employee.
Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Chocksey, Adv. for Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. v. JASPAL KAUR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .....
The High Court upheld the Labour Court's rejection of workmen's claims on the ground of res judicata, holding that compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act had been conclusively adjudicated and the issue could not be re-litigated.
P&M Movies Private Limited v. Sapna @ Sapna Choudhary
The Delhi High Court held that fresh summons are not required under Order XXXVII CPC when the defendant has already been duly served and failed to appear, even if the suit is reclassified from Commercial to Ordinary.
M/S ANJNEY LOYS PVT LTD v. imSR SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed three contempt petitions as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request during video conferencing hearing.
Wholesale Trading Services Pvt Ltd v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that ICAI lacked jurisdiction to reconsider a Chartered Accountant's report accepted by the Karnataka High Court and held that the appellant lacked locus standi, condemning repetitive frivolous litigation as abuse of process.
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Rajiv Kumar Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging inquiry proceedings as infructuous after penalty was imposed and vacated interim orders restraining delays.
Sriniwas Cithapuram & Ors. v. M/S. Speedwing Logistic Solutions P Ltd.
The Delhi High Court refused to recall a prosecution witness after defence evidence closure but granted the accused one final opportunity to lead defence evidence subject to conditions, emphasizing the need to balance fair trial rights with expeditious justice.
Siddharth Banerji & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration without Will to the sole legal heirs of an intestate deceased under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, after due procedural compliance and absence of objections.
Sriniwas Cithapuram & Ors. v. M/S. Speedwing Logistic Solutions P Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners one final opportunity to lead defence evidence but rejected their plea to recall the complainant witness, emphasizing that mere change of counsel is not a ground for recall and that judicial interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is limited.
Avdhesh Mittal & Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order refusing protection from coercive action under the SARFAESI Act, holding that the appellants have an adequate remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
Satya Prakash Singh v. Central Reserve Police Force
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging departmental enquiry and salary recovery against a CRPF constable, holding that interim interference in ongoing disciplinary proceedings is premature.
Bhupendra Narayan Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, with interest on delayed arrears and procedural safeguards for denial.