Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Shashi Aggarwal v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that bail orders should not be disturbed absent strong reasons such as misuse of liberty or violation of bail conditions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation of bail Section 439(2) CrPC Section 482 CrPC

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE v. SMT. OMBIRI & ORS

13 Aug 2024 · CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J · 2024:DHC:6048

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for fatal accident caused by rash and negligent driving, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging liability and quantum.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Compensation Negligence

Kavita Arora v. Leptons Designtek Pvt Ltd. & Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6286

The Delhi High Court held that the NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate allegations of forgery in company disputes and remanded the matter for forensic examination and proper adjudication.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Company Law Board National Company Law Tribunal forgery fabrication of documents

Nishant Tandon v. Commissioner, CGST, East Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6058-DB

The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to provide GST documents physically or electronically to a petitioner denied portal access, allowing appellate remedies without prejudice due to delay.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation GST portal user ID access to GST documents Section 73 CGST Act

NUTECH APPLIANCES v. SUPERINTENDENT RANGE-35, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.

13 Aug 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6074-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to a vague Show Cause Notice and violation of natural justice, directing restoration of registration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice natural justice

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6066
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Pawan Garg v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6067

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 498A IPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement

Saleem Khan & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6068

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Bagri & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6062

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Sh. Balbir v. The State Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6065

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6069

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Uzair Khan v. Nike Innovate CV & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6249-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal with directions for the appellant to furnish an undertaking against trademark infringement, while ensuring ongoing suit and contempt proceedings continue unaffected.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC trademark infringement Local Commissioner report deliberate disobedience

Saijee Developers (P) Ltd. v. Mr. Inderjeet Khanduja & Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:6217

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants access to the suit property for independent valuation, balancing procedural fairness by permitting the plaintiff to respond to new valuation evidence.

civil other valuation of property inspection of suit property expert witness cross-examination

Vijay Singh Dogra v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

13 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6218

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim relief to travel abroad during an ongoing SFIO investigation, holding that travel restrictions are justified to protect the investigation and economic interests despite the petitioner’s fundamental right to travel.

criminal petition_dismissed Look Out Circular Section 482 CrPC Article 21 Constitution of India Right to travel abroad

Dr. Kumud Sharma & Anr. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation

13 Aug 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:6193-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that reimbursement under the ESIC scheme is not available for non-emergency surgeries undertaken without referral from an ESIC hospital.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant ESIC Medical Pensioner's Medical Scheme medical reimbursement non-emergency surgery Office Memorandum 2006

Nadeem v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6192

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy and aiding in a murder, considering his limited role, compliance with interim bail, and the trial stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail Section 439 CrPC complicity co-conspirator

M/S BKB TRANSPORT P LIMITED v. NTPC LTD

13 Aug 2024 · Prateek Jalan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under the contract agreements and that pre-arbitration reference to an Expert Settlement Council is optional, allowing the petitioner to proceed with arbitration.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause jurisdiction seat of arbitration Expert Settlement Council

Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6141
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience by respondents in proceeding with a sexual harassment inquiry, holding that acting on a bona fide interpretation of court orders precludes contempt.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Sexual Harassment Inquiry Internal Complaints Committee POSH Act 2013

Anil Kumar Hajelay & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6144-DB

The Delhi High Court modified its earlier order to require comprehensive administrative and financial sanctions and directed the GNCTD to float a comprehensive tender for hybrid courts infrastructure across all 691 courts, rejecting phased tendering limited to pilot courts.

administrative petition_allowed administrative sanction financial sanction tender hybrid courts

Nandita v. National Testing Agency and Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:6143-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the NEET-UG 2024 answer key, holding that judicial interference is limited to cases where the answer key is demonstrably wrong and upholding the presumption of correctness of expert-verified answer keys.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NEET-UG 2024 answer key challenge judicial review National Testing Agency