Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
Surjeet Kumar Bhogal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that eligibility under the Ex-serviceman quota is determined by the actual date of discharge from the armed forces, and extensions of service delay such eligibility.
Surender Singh Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee of BRO has no fundamental right to deputation and upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s deputation application as per the applicable policy, dismissing claims of discrimination under Article 14.
Pushpanjali Residents’ Welfare Association v. The Deputy Commissioner and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act cannot continue once land is notified under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, but prior vesting orders and appeal rights remain unaffected.
Ajay v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical unfitness findings of the Armed Forces medical boards in a recruitment case, dismissing the petition challenging the medical examination results.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 v. Archana Saluja
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals against ITAT's decision holding no additions under Section 153A could be made as assessments were final and no incriminating material was found during search.
Rayeess Ahmad Shah v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking re-evaluation of LDCE answer sheets, holding that re-evaluation is not permissible without statutory provision or exceptional circumstances.
ANS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF THE CENTRAL TAX GST
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and vacated the interim stay on GST audit proceedings, holding that the issue was conclusively decided by coordinate bench precedents.
Sanjay Bhakta Mathema v. Vipin Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside non-bailable warrants issued under the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing cautious judicial exercise of discretion balancing personal liberty and societal interest, especially amid COVID-19 travel constraints.
Sanjay Bhakta Mathema v. Vipin Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside non-bailable warrants issued under the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing cautious judicial discretion balancing personal liberty and societal interest, especially considering pandemic-related travel restrictions.
Lt. Col. Shaji Joseph v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld that a government servant deputed to the Army Postal Service cannot voluntarily retire directly from APS without repatriation to the parent department, and pensionary benefits must be sanctioned by the parent department.
Mahesh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court modified bail conditions to require personal bond and sureties to be approved by the Trial Court instead of the Investigating Officer in a regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC.
SII. Vijay and Ors. v. State (Govt of Not) of Dftjii & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings was unnecessary.
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to implement appellate orders granting TDS credit and refund with interest for AY 2013-14, emphasizing the binding nature of ITAT and CIT(A) directions.
Mohit v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of the specialist medical board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit for CISF recruitment due to defective vision, dismissing the petition for re-examination.
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to decide the petitioner’s pending rectification application for assessment year 2019-20 within six months, ensuring refund with interest after deletion of erroneous demands.
Benjamin Benjamin and Vats v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a consultancy agreement containing an arbitration clause, following undisputed invocation of arbitration.
Mittal Electronics v. Sujata Home Appliances Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that allegations of suppression of facts cannot be conclusively decided at the interlocutory stage and directed expedited trial and maintenance of accounts in a trademark dispute.
M/S Shri Trinkeshwar Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the sanction of a building plan, holding that the petitioner must pursue statutory remedies before the DRT and DRAT and cannot seek relief under Article 226 to circumvent those forums.
M/S ASHA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate construction contract disputes where the respondent failed to appoint one.
Kapsons Worldwide v. Joint Labour Commissioner & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that terms of reference framing factual conclusions are improper and that Labour Courts must independently adjudicate all issues after evidence, while directing fair conduct in conciliation proceedings.