Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S MJ BIZCRAFTS LLP v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, DELHI SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE
The Delhi High Court upheld the provisional attachment of the petitioner’s bank accounts under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act, ruling that such attachment is valid once proceedings have commenced and is aimed at protecting government revenue irrespective of legal disputes on GST liability.
Container Corporation of India Limited v. M/S Shivalaya Construction Company Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable under the Commercial Courts Act against the rejection of a limitation-based Order VII Rule 11 application.
Amit Garg & Anr. v. The Secretary (Alt.) Land Building Department Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed allotment of an alternative residential plot to petitioners whose land was acquired, affirming eligibility under statutory policy despite delay and non-compliance by authorities.
Kawakami, Shigeki & Ors. v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a patent application for lack of novelty on grounds not communicated in the hearing notice, emphasizing the mandatory requirement to inform all objections prior to hearing under the principles of natural justice.
Ravi Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful revocation of a stamp vending license by the DDA, holding that the petitioner had no vested rights to prevent cancellation of a permissive license.
Tkreeb v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the accused's petition to recall the prosecutrix for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, emphasizing the need to ensure a fair trial by granting a final opportunity to cross-examine a crucial witness in a sexual offence case.
State v. Durgesh Nandini & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of Respondent No. 1, holding that no sufficient material existed to frame charges under Section 506 IPC for criminal intimidation, emphasizing the limited scope of charge framing under Sections 227 and 228 CrPC.
M/S WORLD INFRACONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S SHUBH ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve a dispute arising from a valid arbitration agreement, despite the respondent's initial refusal to consent.
Shri Punit Chitkara v. Shri Gagan Preet Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to correct errors and challenge a subsequent Sale Deed, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments before trial for effective adjudication without causing prejudice.
Ankit Garg v. Narender
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring a suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to effect service and non-payment of costs, reducing the costs and granting the plaintiff another opportunity to proceed.
Mohd Shakir & Ors. v. Delhi Public Library & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an advertisement for deputation-based recruitment to Library Clerk posts that bypassed eligible internal candidates entitled to promotion under the Recruitment Rules.
Sadhna Payal v. Rukmani Devi Jaipuria Public School & Anr.
Private recognized unaided school employees are entitled to gratuity and leave encashment benefits at par with government school employees under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.
Om Prakash v. Sheesh Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing specific performance of an agreement to sell, holding that a subsequent purchaser with knowledge of the prior contract cannot claim bona fide purchaser status without a valid sale deed.
AIMLAY PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (DELHI WEST)
The Delhi High Court held that seized assets must be returned within 30 days under CGST Act, denied interim refund of allegedly coerced deposit, and disposed of the petition without granting relief on bank account freezing.
Shri Raj Kumar v. Sumitra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no valid oral partition of jointly owned property occurred, affirming co-ownership with undivided shares and denying mesne profits claims, directing partition by metes and bounds.
SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 22(2), Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that mechanical sanction under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act without application of mind is invalid, quashing the reopening order and notice issued thereunder.
Geeta Sharma v. Steel Authority of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's dismissal of the petitioner's challenge to her exclusion from the shortlist for Director (Finance) at SAIL, holding that lien-holding candidates are to be considered internal candidates with seniority frozen as on lien date under applicable CPSE appointment guidelines.
M/S New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Rinki Devi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, holding that statutory liability under the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be avoided due to non-disclosure of ownership transfer and that negligence must be proven by evidence.
Morgan Asia Limited v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the RBI's statutory power to regulate NBFCs, dismissed the challenge to the 2014 notification mandating minimum capital requirements, and affirmed the validity of the cancellation of the petitioner's Certificate of Registration.
Dr. Vijay Kumar Sharma v. United India Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that compassionate allowance claims must be considered on compassionate grounds with special consideration, not rejected solely on misconduct allegations, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's claim following his compulsory retirement.