Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Sudhir Bhatia Trading As v. Central Government of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an illegible trademark advertisement after registration, holding that statutory remedies under the Trade Marks Act must be exhausted and writ jurisdiction is not a substitute.
MICROSOFT REGIONAL SALES CORPORATION v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals as infructuous after the ITAT ruled in favor of appellants on the remanded issue of royalty on shrink wrapped software.
SEMCO Infratech Pvt Ltd v. Simla Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the amendment of the trademark suit, consolidated related proceedings, and recorded a settlement delineating the use of 'SIMCO' and 'SEMCO' marks across specified classes, thereby resolving the dispute.
Ayesa Ingenieria y Arquitectura S.A.U v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Delhi High Court upheld the tender evaluation treating a twin tube metro project as a single contract, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the award on grounds of plausible interpretation and absence of arbitrariness.
SEMCO Infratech Pvt Ltd v. Simla Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the trademark suit, consolidated related proceedings, and recorded a settlement delineating the use of 'SIMCO' and 'SEMCO' marks across specified classes, thereby disposing of all disputes between the parties.
Mohd Anas v. State (Govt NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the accused holding that custodial interrogation is necessary due to non-cooperation and evidence implicating him in a violent assault.
PUMA SE v. HI-TEC POINT TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD. AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement granting permanent injunction to PUMA SE against defendants using the 'PUMA' mark on GPS devices, directing cessation of use, domain transfer, and removal of infringing online content.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. MOL Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the ITAT's remand order on royalty payments as infructuous, affirming adherence to binding Supreme Court precedent.
Yogesh Saraogi & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under multiple IPC sections on the basis of a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. Microsoft Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeals holding that payments for software licensing under EULAs do not constitute taxable royalty income in India, following binding Supreme Court precedent.
M/S SUBROS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against refusal of the trademark 'SBS World School', directing the Registrar to reconsider the application in light of the appellant's existing similar registrations.
SEMCO Infratech Pvt Ltd v. Simla Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the trademark suit, consolidated multiple proceedings, and recorded a settlement delineating the use of SIMCO and SEMCO marks across specified classes, thereby resolving the dispute amicably.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation v. MOL Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the ITAT's remand order, affirming that software sales constitute sale of copyrighted articles under the Indo-US DTAA and are not taxable as royalty.
Mukish v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor under the POCSO Act, relying on scientific evidence and presumption provisions despite hostile witnesses and non-examination of the victim.
Narendra Kumar Saxena & Anr. v. Surendra Kumar Saxena & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to lack of territorial jurisdiction over a dispute concerning immovable property situated in Rajasthan, holding that arbitration agreements are separable from underlying contracts and stamping issues do not bar arbitration.
Munesh Kumari v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging SDMC encroachment removal notices and ATMCD order, holding that the petitioners must seek remedy before the District Judge as per Supreme Court precedent.
Usha Mann v. Rajiv Vaid & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party, including a lawyer, cannot be prohibited from self-representation in civil proceedings and quashed an order directing the petitioner to engage counsel or be barred from conducting her own case.
Ojha v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks
The Delhi High Court clarified procedures for handling trademark oppositions filed beyond limitation during the pandemic, attributed communication lapses to the CGPDTM office, upheld costs on officers, and directed expeditious recruitment to address pendency.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting registration of the mark “DON’T WORRY” in Class-3 on a proposed-to-use basis, recognizing prior registrations and use in other classes and imposing conditions to protect common words.
Hardev Singh v. Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements and remanded the matter for reconsideration after due hearing.