Delhi High Court

71,673 judgments

Year:

The European Union v. Union of India & Ors.

31 May 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2302
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions to set aside deemed abandonment of patent applications caused by patent agent's negligence, holding that courts may condone delay in filing replies to First Examination Reports in exceptional cases to protect applicants' rights.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patents Act, 1970 Section 21(1) First Examination Report deemed abandonment

The European Union v. Union of India & Ors.

31 May 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2301

The Delhi High Court held that while statutory timelines for replying to First Examination Reports under the Patents Act are mandatory, it may in exceptional cases restore patent applications deemed abandoned due to patent agent negligence and absence of applicant's intention to abandon.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patents Act, 1970 Section 21(1) First Examination Report deemed abandonment

Ashutosh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority

31 May 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2227

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of allotment by DDA for non-payment of balance premium beyond the stipulated deadline, affirming strict adherence to auction terms and timelines.

administrative petition_dismissed e-auction allotment cancellation payment extension Delhi Development Authority

Amit Sharma v. Shelkka Sharma & Ors.

31 May 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2157

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging maintenance awarded under Section 125 Cr.P.C, holding that the income assessment and maintenance quantum were reasonable and within the court's discretion, with no error warranting interference.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C maintenance interim maintenance revisional jurisdiction

Nitendra Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

31 May 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2158

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging termination of sports complex membership for non-payment of subscription fees, holding no legal right existed to compel restoration without payment.

administrative petition_dismissed writ of mandamus natural justice membership termination subscription fees

SMS Water Grace BMW Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

31 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:2310-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the appellant's obligation to treat bio-medical waste free of cost was not limited to 1000 kgs/day, dismissing the appeal for lack of patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Bio-medical waste

Ramji Das Dhal Construction Pvt. Ltd - SKS JV v. Chief Engineer (AF) WAC, Palam & Ors.

31 May 2022 · VIPIN SANGHI, ACJ; SACHIN DATTA, J · 2022:DHC:2295-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a Joint Venture's tender bid for failing to meet mandatory qualifying criteria individually, emphasizing limited judicial review over expert tender evaluations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Joint Venture Tender Evaluation Qualifying Criteria Technical Bid Rejection

National Seeds Corporation Ltd v. National Agro Seeds Corporation (India)

31 May 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2144-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that acknowledgment of debt extended limitation and that trade discounts were payable irrespective of subsidy receipt, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Acknowledgment of debt Limitation Act Indian Contract Act Trade discount

Epsilon Eduventures Private Limited v. Nikhil Goel

31 May 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2022:DHC:6030

The Delhi High Court confirmed the appointment of Mr. B.B. Sawhney as Sole Arbitrator after requisite disclosures and allowed correction of counsel's name in the arbitration proceedings.

arbitration other Arbitration Section 12 Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 Sole Arbitrator appointment Disclosure by arbitrator

Kh. Rabi Singh v. Sashastra Seema Bal

31 May 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2155-DB

The Delhi High Court directed payment of Patient Care Allowance as per the 2004 Circular, quashing the 2020 Circular's denial of PCA to personnel receiving other Risk Allowances.

administrative petition_allowed Patient Care Allowance Risk Allowance Sashastra Seema Bal Circular dated 14.08.2020

Satish Mohan Aggarwal v. State

31 May 2022 · Asha Menon

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner, holding that the dispute was civil in nature with no prima facie offence under Sections 420, 467, or 34 IPC, and that criminal prosecution would amount to abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR cheating forgery

Himanshu Shekhar v. Prabhat Shekhar

31 May 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:2132

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator is not ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 where the familial relationship with the parties is distant and not a 'close family relationship' as defined in the Seventh Schedule, dismissing the petition to terminate the arbitrator's mandate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Seventh Schedule close family relationship

Rajesh Kapoor v. Office of the Ld. Principal District and Sessions Judge

31 May 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2138
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a circular restricting foreign travel leave to vacation periods and exigencies, dismissing a petition challenging the denial of leave as constitutionally valid and consistent with service rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Earned Leave Foreign travel leave Article 14 Article 21

Adhunik Security Services v. National Highway Authority of India

31 May 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2198
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Order XXI Rule 58(4) CPC is not maintainable against an interim order in execution proceedings that does not conclusively adjudicate the rights of parties, and interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration Act applies only where the arbitral award is silent on interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 58(4) CPC appealability decree definition adjudication

Preeti Pratap Singh v. Kiran Raj Bisaria

31 May 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:2139

The Delhi High Court upheld the binding nature of a consent decree in a partition and possession dispute, emphasizing compliance with its terms and rejecting attempts to revive waived mesne profits absent breach of possession obligations.

civil other Significant consent decree mesne profits possession partition suit

Bithi Rohatgi v. Varun Kakkar

31 May 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2150

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's jurisdiction and order for physical production of the child in a custody dispute under the Guardians and Wards Act.

family petition_dismissed Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 12 Family Court jurisdiction custody of child

Satish Chandra v. Krishan Kumar & Ors.

31 May 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2199
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld that an unconditional status quo order includes maintaining the existing user of property, and converting a room into a shop violated the order, dismissing the petition under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant status quo Article 227 Code of Civil Procedure supervisory jurisdiction

Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr.

31 May 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2167-DB

Delhi High Court held that estimation disputes under Section 14A do not amount to misreporting under Section 270A, quashing penalty and directing grant of immunity under Section 270AA.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 270A Income Tax Act Section 270AA Income Tax Act Section 14A disallowance misreporting of income

Ebera Nwanaforo v. Narcotics Control Bureau; Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau

31 May 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:2175
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to foreign nationals accused under the NDPS Act after prolonged incarceration exceeding eight years, balancing the statutory bail bar with the fundamental right to speedy trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail commercial quantity

Raj Kumar @ Bhola v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

31 May 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:2516

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole for a life convict who had previously absconded during furlough, holding that denial under Rule 1211 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 was justified.

criminal petition_dismissed parole Delhi Prison Rules 2018 Rule 1211 murder after kidnapping for ransom