Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Dharam Raj v. Jai Kishan
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the defendant's belated written statement application but allowed participation upon payment of costs, clarifying limitation extension due to COVID-19 does not apply retrospectively.
Karim Hotel Pvt Ltd v. Kareem Dhanani
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from further use and expansion of the mark "KAREEM'S" due to the plaintiff's prior trademark rights and directed disclaimers and public notices to prevent consumer confusion.
JBM Electric Vehicles Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing JBM Electric Vehicles to participate in certain State Government tenders despite a debarment by the Ministry of Heavy Industries, preserving rights pending final adjudication of the writ petition.
Vinita v. Ashok Perumulla RLC Central
The Delhi High Court set aside orders of the Regional Labour Commissioner for failure to afford hearing and directed fresh reasoned orders after hearing the petitioners.
Vinita v. Ashok Perumulla RLC Central
The Delhi High Court set aside orders of the Regional Labour Commissioner for failure to afford hearing and directed fresh reasoned orders to be passed expeditiously.
Rajan Pal Singh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging forgery, holding that a subsequent complaint is maintainable when the first complaint was not acted upon and criminal remedies coexist with civil suits.
India Tourism Development Corporation Limited v. Bougainvillea Multiplex Entertainment Centre Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that a licensor's failure to repair premises constituted fundamental breach, rejecting the appellant's challenge based on patent illegality and affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Nitin Khetan v. Ekta Khetan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's jurisdictional requirement that visitation rights petitions concerning minor children must be filed where the children ordinarily reside, directing expeditious disposal of the matter.
Rajan Lao v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is a decree appealable under Section 96 CPC, thus excluding jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 for such orders.
Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Deepti Gupta
The Delhi High Court declined to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the matter within a fixed time or restrain adjournments, emphasizing the Trial Court's discretion and the need for expeditious disposal.
Gajender Kumar v. Janak Raj & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of an execution petition to the court territorially competent over the property under Section 24 CPC and Article 227 of the Constitution, rejecting objections based on non-subordination of the Rent Controller's court.
Hospital Employees Union v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside adverse observations and cost directions against the Hospital Employees Union for lack of proof that the workman informed the Union of his employment during a compassionate appointment claim.
M/S ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to grant adequate time to the assessee to file a reply, emphasizing the statutory right to respond under Section 148A(b).
Vortex Rubber Industries Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner VAT and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the VAT Tribunal's orders for failing to give the appellant an opportunity to prove inter-state sales, remanding the matter for a fresh hearing with due opportunity.
Sh Jagmohan Kashyap v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the condonation of delay in filing an appeal under the DV Act, emphasizing liberal construction of limitation in welfare matters and rejecting the petitioner's challenge.
Chandra Prabha Mahajan v. Praveen Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a civil suit involving tenancy and ownership disputes over the same property to avoid conflicting decisions, affirming the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and the discretionary power under Section 24 CPC.
Bhajan Singh v. S. Lachhman Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order closing defence evidence for non-compliance, holding that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 does not permit interference absent jurisdictional error.
Harcharan Dass Gupta v. Hindustan Pre-Fab Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the principal is bound by the arbitration agreement entered into by its agent with the petitioner.
Meenu Chaufla v. Income Tax Officer Ward 49(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must consider the assessee's reply to a Show Cause Notice under Section 148A(b) before passing an order under Section 148A(d), and set aside the impugned order for non-compliance.
Jyoti Phogat v. Ashwani Kadian
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim custody order passed on consent by the Family Court and directed expeditious disposal of pending applications under the Guardians and Wards Act and CPC.