Delhi High Court
67,052 judgments
State v. Ibrahim Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted under MCOCA with liberty to the State to seek cancellation upon discovery of credible evidence, emphasizing strict adherence to MCOCA's bail provisions.
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Mr. Madhu Paul Trading as M/s. Mahannam Mobil House
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting Exxon Mobil's registered trademark 'MOBIL' against unauthorized use by a local trader, awarding costs and dismissing the defendant's defense for non-appearance.
Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd v. Ircon International Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the pre-appointment stage, a prima facie valid arbitration agreement must be referred to arbitration, appointing an arbitrator despite the respondent's contention that the arbitration clause was superseded by special contract conditions.
Kapri International Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax - IV, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that disputed interest without disputed tax falls within the scope of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and rejected the CIT’s narrow interpretation excluding waiver-related appeals, thereby allowing the petitioner’s writ petition and directing reconsideration of their declarations under the Act.
Ghulam Sarwar v. Nilofar Khan & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a discretionary order granting respondents independent access to a terrace, holding that interference under Article 227 is unwarranted absent perversity.
Ram Kishan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police constable for demanding bribe, holding that departmental enquiry findings supported by evidence and conducted fairly cannot be interfered with by reappreciation of evidence.
State v. Ibrahim Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted under MCOCA with liberty to the State to seek cancellation upon new evidence, clarifying that anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. does not apply to MCOCA offences.
Kumar Manglam v. Manik Lal Rauth
The Delhi High Court allowed conditional leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC upon deposit of the principal amount and fixed timelines for trial.
Sunil Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging transfer and relieving orders as infructuous since the petitioners were posted together subsequently.
V v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a petitioner charged under Section 376AB IPC and POCSO Act, holding that the statutory bar under Section 438(4) Cr.P.C. applies to such offences involving sexual assault on a minor.
Dr. Harish Gupta v. U.O.I & Others
The Delhi High Court held that nominations by State Medical Councils to the Medical Advisory Council under the National Medical Commission Act are revocable at the pleasure of the nominating Council, and no fixed tenure is conferred absent statutory provision.
Anil Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Anil Kumar for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence, rejecting challenges to witness reliability and weapon recovery.
Kamdhenu Limited v. Aashiana Rolling Mills Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed Kamdhenu's appeal, holding that its registered surface pattern design was not novel due to prior publication in British Standard BS4449-2005, justifying summary dismissal of its infringement suit.
SMT RAMA ALIAS RAMO v. UOI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging denial of disability pension, upholding the binding medical board opinion and pension regulations.
Virgo Softech Ltd v. National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology
Delhi High Court held that it has territorial jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act despite earlier dismissal, as the law on territorial jurisdiction changed, and the arbitration clause designates New Delhi as the seat of arbitration.
Rajnish Puri v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 43(1), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside and remanded reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act due to vague allegations in the notice, emphasizing the need for precise allegations to ensure fair opportunity to the assessee.
Ramaa Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an Adjudicating Authority who ceases to hold office cannot pronounce reserved judgments thereafter, and time extension notifications do not apply to such officers, dismissing the appellants' challenge to the appointment of a new authority.
Dr. Vishnu Todi v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that autonomous institutions' seat reservation policies prevail over examination authority errors, denying admission to a foreign national candidate where no seats were reserved.
Shashi Bhushan Singh & Ors. v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the internal administrative decision of the CRPF but directed the superior officer to respond to a pending communication within two weeks.
National Board of Examination v. Association of MD Physicians
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of the National Board of Examination, holding that courts must exercise restraint and defer to expert opinion in academic matters, setting aside the writ court's direction to award additional marks for a disputed FMGE question.