Santosh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 08 Aug 2022 · 2022:DHC:3033-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
W.P.(C) 11680/2022
2022:DHC:3033-DB
administrative appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged Indian Air Force employee in line with established pension rules and prior judgments.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 11680/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: August 08, 2022
W.P.(C) 11680/2022 & CM APPL. 34748/2022
SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, SPC with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a writ of mandamus for directing the respondents to grant pro-rata pension from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits along with interest @14% in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 9905/2019.

2. According to petitioner, he was enrolled in Indian Air Force on 03.06.1999 and underwent required training successfully. Petitioner had appeared in the interview and was selected to the post of Probationary 2022:DHC:3033-DB Officer in Canara Bank after obtaining “No Objection Certificate” dated 19.10.2010 from respondent. The petitioner was then offered to join the above-said post in Canara Bank in terms of the appointment letter dated 23.11.2010. The petitioner stood discharged from the services of IAF on 13.12.2010 after rendering regular service of 11 years, 06 months and 10 days.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by virtue of Notification no. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) dated 26.05.2005 and in terms with Rule 37 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, all employees of Central Government are entitled to grant of pro-rata pension and that in view of judgment dated 09.01.2019 rendered in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019, titled as Govind Kumar Srivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors., which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, respondents be directed to grant prorata pension with arrears to the petitioner for their past services in Air Force.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, learned Senior Panel Counsel has entered appearance on advance notice and submits that the case of petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

6. Upon hearing, we dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and if found eligible, release pro-rata pension with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2019 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

7. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application is disposed of as infructuous.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE AUGUST 8, 2022