Delhi High Court
96,004 judgments
Ambika Kapur v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle Int Tax 2(1)(2) New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment proceedings initiated on the incorrect assumption of non-filing of income tax return and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with directions to record findings and allow the petitioner to submit relevant documents.
Viraj Exports Private Limited & Anr. v. The Chief Commissioner of Income (TDS), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of a compounding application for TDS defaults due to prior undisclosed convictions, holding that stay of conviction does not alter compounding eligibility under CBDT Guidelines.
Ashish Chand & Anr. v. Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging EPFO's recovery notice, directing the recovery amount to be secured and allowing the petitioners to operate their bank accounts pending statutory appeal.
Neha Jadhav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of the petitioner's admission permission to a sports coaching diploma course, holding that revised guidelines cannot retrospectively negate her eligibility after qualifying the entrance test and paying fees.
Ravin Kumar alias Rabin Kumar v. Dr. Sushil Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction and upheld the Commercial Court's order granting possession to the landlord in a rent dispute lacking evidence of security deposit payment.
Nadeem v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a husband for murdering his wife, affirming that cohabitation and circumstantial evidence shift the burden to the accused under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act to provide a plausible explanation.
Sh. Manoj Yadav v. Land and Bldg, Deptt GNCTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for allotment of an alternative plot due to non-submission of requisite documents, holding that the administrative decision was lawful and not liable to interference under Article 226.
M/S CALVIN KLEIN ARVIND FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED v. SADDAM HUSSAIN
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte Labour Court award passed contrary to record and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing release of deposited funds subject to an indemnity bond.
Manish Gupta v. UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of all APAR entries to employees violates Article 14 and natural justice, directing re-examination of promotion claims after disclosure, while upholding the employer's discretion in promotion criteria subject to fairness.
Prem Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order denying pension fixation based on an erroneously granted higher pay scale, affirming that pension benefits must be fixed according to the correct pay scale.
Aquarius Fincap and Credits Private Limited v. National Faceless Appeal Centre & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the National Faceless Appeal Centre to decide the petitioner's rectification applications regarding wrongful disposal of a quantum appeal under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme applies only to specified appeals.
Harender Maan v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, applying the principle of parity with co-accused and holding that mere naming in the FIR and reliance on co-accused disclosure statements without corroborative evidence do not justify denial of bail.
Sh Nitin Sharma v. District Level Recommendation Committee
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of alternative plot allotment under the Scheme of 1961, holding that ownership of alternative residential accommodation disqualifies entitlement under the Scheme.
M/S ZAPDOR ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. v. ASSISTANT PF COMMISSIONER NOIDA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the remaining pre-deposit amount under the Employees Provident Fund Act before the Tribunal admits the appeal, refusing total waiver but restraining coercive action meanwhile.
Prabha Bennett & Ors. v. Rohit Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that joint account holders cannot claim exclusive ownership of funds without proving the deceased's intention, and legal heirs are entitled to their share under the Hindu Succession Act, granting plaintiffs decree under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
Manish Gupta v. UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of all APAR entries to employees before promotion consideration violates Article 14 and directed re-examination of promotion claims after proper communication, while upholding the employer's promotion criteria and interview process.
ATS Infrastructure Limited v. Vishnu Vaibhav Industries Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that only the Inter-Corporate Deposit Agreement containing a valid arbitration clause is arbitrable, dismissing arbitration petitions relating to independent MoUs lacking arbitration clauses and appointing a sole arbitrator for disputes under the ICDA.
Raja Arora & Anr. v. Ms. Meera Arun & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that criminal courts have jurisdiction to enforce mediation settlements under Sections 431 and 421 Cr.P.C. even for cases pending in other courts, and parties who sign such settlements are liable for enforcement.
National Highways Authority of India v. M/S JMC Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting payment for bitumen variance, ruling that a waiver letter given under duress was not binding and emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.
M/S. JHAJJZ PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406/120B IPC as the dispute was civil in nature, the Mohali Police had already conducted a preliminary inquiry, and the second complaint in Delhi amounted to abuse of process and forum shopping.