Delhi High Court
60,196 judgments
Jaypee Healthcare Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court reduced the pre-deposit amount from 40% to 20% under Section 7-O of the EPF Act, allowing the petitioner to deposit the reduced amount to admit the appeal before the CGIT.
Mohd Ershad Sole Proprietor EK Agencies v. Registrar of Copyrights & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of the mandatory no objection certificate under Section 45 of the Copyright Act invalidates subsequent copyright registration of an artistic work, ordering removal of a deceptively similar label's registration.
Gurjeet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in an NDPS case involving intermediate quantity of opium and large unaccounted cash, holding that procedural irregularities are trial issues and bail is not automatic.
Phulgita Devi v. Krishan Kmar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a trial court order dismissing an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for lack of reasoning and remanded the matter for fresh disposal.
Prabhat Ranjan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to an ex-IAF personnel discharged before retirement, in line with established legal precedents.
R Kartikeyan Iyer v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged Air Force employee in line with earlier binding judgments.
Aditi Bakht v. Abhishek Ahuja
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's refusal to admit an additional affidavit without formal amendment, emphasizing limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and directing the Family Court to decide the guardianship petition on merits.
M/S. BALAJI ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to vague show-cause notice and procedural lapses, emphasizing mandatory compliance with natural justice and CGST Rules.
Rajiv Sikka & Anr v. Ashok Kumar Jain
The High Court upheld the discretionary appointment of a local commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC before evidence was led, dismissing the petition challenging the order under Article 227 as a misuse of jurisdiction.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. MS. PNB Housing Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's deletion of disallowances under Sections 36(1)(viii) and 14A of the Income Tax Act, affirming that Section 14A does not apply to exempt income from investments held as stock-in-trade.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ram Nath
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Transport Corporation to recognize the respondent under the Employee Pension Scheme, 1995 and complete pension disbursal within six weeks, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Mohan Sakpal and Anr. v. Abhay Goyal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's discretionary order directing company directors to appear personally in execution proceedings, clarifying the limited scope of Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction.
Anita Rai v. State
The Delhi High Court directed police to register an FIR for bigamy under Section 494 IPC, holding that refusal to register FIR in such cases is impermissible and police must investigate the offence.
Bizibi Infotech Pvt Ltd v. HCL Infosystem Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed Bizibi's petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding the claims ex facie barred by limitation and partly outside the arbitration agreement.
Jasween Sandhu v. State
The High Court held that only the drawer and signatory of a cheque can be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the complaint and summons against a non-drawer petitioner.
Arun Kumar Murarka v. Rajesh Sultania & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a trademark opposition filed within the pandemic-extended limitation period must be accepted by the Registry, rendering a cancellation petition infructuous and directing the Registry to update the trademark status accordingly.
M/S P. M. K VASTARA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. OFFICE OF THE JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (DISTT.- SOUTH) AND ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the awarded amount within eight weeks to set aside the ex-parte Labour Court Award, dismissing the writ petition for delay and non-compliance.
PCIT, Delhi-7 v. M/S PNB Housing Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax appeal challenging ITAT's deletion of disallowance under Section 36(1)(viii), emphasizing the importance of consistency and no substantial question of law arising.
Cross Fit LLC v. RTB Gym and Fitness Centre
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Cross Fit LLC against RTB Gym for unauthorized use of the 'CROSSFIT' trademark, and initiated contempt proceedings for violation of the injunction.
Amrit Sandhu Coster v. State & Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act holding that a cheque issued in discharge of a time-barred debt does not attract penal liability.