Delhi High Court
96,004 judgments
Aditi Bakht v. Abhishek Ahuja
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's refusal to admit an additional affidavit without formal amendment, emphasizing limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and directing the Family Court to decide the guardianship petition on merits.
M/S. BALAJI ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to vague show-cause notice and procedural lapses, emphasizing mandatory compliance with natural justice and CGST Rules.
Rajiv Sikka & Anr v. Ashok Kumar Jain
The High Court upheld the discretionary appointment of a local commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC before evidence was led, dismissing the petition challenging the order under Article 227 as a misuse of jurisdiction.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. MS. PNB Housing Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's deletion of disallowances under Sections 36(1)(viii) and 14A of the Income Tax Act, affirming that Section 14A does not apply to exempt income from investments held as stock-in-trade.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ram Nath
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Transport Corporation to recognize the respondent under the Employee Pension Scheme, 1995 and complete pension disbursal within six weeks, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Mohan Sakpal and Anr. v. Abhay Goyal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's discretionary order directing company directors to appear personally in execution proceedings, clarifying the limited scope of Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction.
Anita Rai v. State
The Delhi High Court directed police to register an FIR for bigamy under Section 494 IPC, holding that refusal to register FIR in such cases is impermissible and police must investigate the offence.
Bizibi Infotech Pvt Ltd v. HCL Infosystem Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed Bizibi's petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding the claims ex facie barred by limitation and partly outside the arbitration agreement.
Jasween Sandhu v. State
The High Court held that only the drawer and signatory of a cheque can be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the complaint and summons against a non-drawer petitioner.
Arun Kumar Murarka v. Rajesh Sultania & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a trademark opposition filed within the pandemic-extended limitation period must be accepted by the Registry, rendering a cancellation petition infructuous and directing the Registry to update the trademark status accordingly.
M/S P. M. K VASTARA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. OFFICE OF THE JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (DISTT.- SOUTH) AND ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the awarded amount within eight weeks to set aside the ex-parte Labour Court Award, dismissing the writ petition for delay and non-compliance.
PCIT, Delhi-7 v. M/S PNB Housing Finance Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the income tax appeal challenging ITAT's deletion of disallowance under Section 36(1)(viii), emphasizing the importance of consistency and no substantial question of law arising.
Cross Fit LLC v. RTB Gym and Fitness Centre
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Cross Fit LLC against RTB Gym for unauthorized use of the 'CROSSFIT' trademark, and initiated contempt proceedings for violation of the injunction.
Amrit Sandhu Coster v. State & Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act holding that a cheque issued in discharge of a time-barred debt does not attract penal liability.
Vijay Bhushan Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner, though not entitled to regularization from 1977, must have his case considered for regularization from his ad-hoc appointment date to maintain parity with similarly placed juniors.
ALLEIMA MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY (JIANGSU) CO LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court declined interim relief against the petitioner’s categorization as "non-cooperative" in an ongoing anti-dumping investigation, leaving final adjudication to the Designated Authority under the Customs Tariff Rules, 1995.
Bernadette Lakra and Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that ad-hoc promotions do not confer seniority rights and directed that Promotees receive seniority only from their regular promotion date, placing Direct Recruits above Promotees in the seniority list.
Biba Sawhney v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a guarantor released by the lender and excluded from subsequent credit facilities cannot be held liable for repayment of loans sanctioned thereafter, setting aside recovery orders against her.
Dhani Loans and Services Ltd v. Pansari Developers Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders under Section 25(B) of the Arbitration Act are not independently challengeable under Article 227 and must be contested only after the final arbitral award.
Richa Arya v. Pawan Arya
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order under Section 471 IPC against petitioners for lack of prima facie evidence of dishonest use of forged documents, emphasizing the necessity of judicial mind at the cognizance stage.