Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Mayank Garg v. Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-evaluation of answer sheets in the DHJS examination, holding that no provision exists for re-assessment and the marks awarded are final and binding.
M/S MAAN PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. v. M/S MINDWAVE HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's jurisdiction and maintainability of a quia timet trademark infringement suit despite the plaintiff's registered office being outside the court's jurisdiction and non-filing of a Legal Proceedings Certificate.
EX CPL Ram Kunwar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to the petitioner for past service in the Indian Air Force, in line with binding precedents and pension rules.
St. Stephen’s College v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court balanced minority institutions' right to administer admissions under Article 30(1) with the University's CUET mandate, allowing interviews with weightage but requiring adherence to standardized merit assessment and a single merit list for minority candidates.
Mohd Shakeel & Ors. v. Mohd Islam
The Delhi High Court held that an injunctive decree restraining dispossession cannot ordinarily be stayed at the interlocutory stage, dismissing the petition challenging the rejection of such a stay.
Spade Financial Services Limited v. AKME Projects Limited & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the recovery suit by Spade Financial Services Limited against Akme Projects Limited, holding that Spade is not a financial creditor due to collusive transactions and that the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars continuation of the suit.
Raju v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.
Renu Proptech Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that new information justifies reassessment and such matters cannot be challenged on merits in writ jurisdiction.
Ambika Pillai Designer Salon v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to consider the petitioner’s request for extension of time under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme due to serious illness and financial hardship, ensuring fair and consistent treatment.
Vidhya Bhushan @ Shashi Bhushan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness identification, lawful weapon recovery, forensic evidence, and established motive, dismissing the appeal.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Javed Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit filed by Louis Vuitton against defendants selling counterfeit 'LV' logo footwear based on a settlement restraining use of the 'LV' logo and awarding litigation costs.
M/S MGM STONE AGGREGATES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a reassessment notice issued within the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the notice and related CBDT instructions.
Prabhawati Devi v. Sanjeev Kumar Jha
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying correct income, multiplier, and future prospects principles as per Supreme Court precedents.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld and supervised the essential redevelopment of Kalkaji Mandir, directing eviction of unauthorized occupants, allotment of temporary shops, and preparation of a joint redevelopment plan while ensuring stakeholder participation and compliance with court orders.
Indraprastha Power Generation Co Ltd v. Someer Chaterjee
The Delhi High Court held that orders setting aside domestic inquiries on preliminary issues are interlocutory and not amenable to writ challenge before final adjudication, dismissing the management's petitions.
Rudra Prakash Trivedi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to frame Recruitment Rules within three months and conduct promotions for newly created posts in ITBP, emphasizing adherence to Ministry of Personnel guidelines and protection of service rights.
Deepmala v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail of accused Chander Shekhar, holding that mere apprehension and vague allegations without concrete evidence of tampering or interference do not justify bail cancellation.
INSP/GD Robin Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to correctly fix the pay of CRPF personnel promoted through LDCE as per the pre-revised pay scale, granting arrears and benefits if eligibility criteria are met.
Nortel Networks India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi High Court directs Income Tax authorities to decide pending rectification applications within six weeks, enforcing statutory timelines under Section 154(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Indraprastha Power Generation Co Ltd v. Someer Chaterjee
The Delhi High Court dismissed the management's writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's interlocutory order setting aside a domestic inquiry, holding that such preliminary issues are not ordinarily amenable to writ challenge before final adjudication.