Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:3835-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to assign the petitioner to a medically suitable sedentary post of Office Khalasi within four weeks, quashing the impugned movement order.

administrative petition_allowed sedentary job medical condition movement order writ petition

Gagan Gupta v. The Commissioner of Customs (I and G)

22 Sep 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4436-DB

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of conclusive proof of service of a Customs appeal order via speed post, the benefit of doubt must be given to the petitioner, setting aside the dismissal of revision for delay and remitting for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 153 service of order speed post

Harish Kumar v. Inder Mohan Nagpal

22 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3871
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the maintainability of an eviction petition filed by one co-owner under the doctrine of agency, restricting rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC to the plaint's averments and limiting its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC Article 227 Constitution

Sanjay Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:3832-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued in the name of a dissolved partnership firm are without jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to file supplementary replies before fresh orders are passed.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d)

Pramod Kumar v. Pawan Hans Ltd

22 Sep 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:3896

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging a transfer order as the petitioner was no longer posted to the challenged location, allowing him liberty to challenge any fresh transfer order separately.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order punitive transfer bona fide transfer review petition

Union of India v. Girbar Singh

22 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3937-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of clause 10 of the MACP Scheme, directing the Union of India to grant financial upgradation benefits to respondents based on their entire service, including past service in State Government.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant MACP Scheme 2009 financial upgradation clause 10 Central Administrative Tribunal

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

22 Sep 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:3831

The Delhi High Court upheld fixed tehbazari fees and denied permission for temporary tables in Kalkaji Mandir, directing strict regulation of shops and hawkers with police deployment for crowd management during Navratras.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tehbazari temporary shops Kalkaji Mandir unauthorized hawking

Adroit Financial Services Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors.

22 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:3833-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond limitation where escaped income was below Rs. 50 lakh, holding such reopening violative of CBDT Instruction No. 01/2022.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 149(1)(b) CBDT Instruction No. 01/2022

BGR Mining and Infra Limited v. NTPC Limited & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:3848-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of NTPC's banning orders against BGR Mining and NCC BGR Consortium, dismissing appeals challenging review petitions and affirming the limited scope of judicial review and the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant banning orders arbitrariness reasonable judgement Section 16 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Budh Ram v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Sep 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:3857-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that employees of unit run canteens are not government employees and contractual appointees post-superannuation cannot claim continuation of service up to age 60 years.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unit run canteen employees government employee status contractual appointment retirement age

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. PRIYANKA

22 Sep 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:3889-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the CAT order directing renewal of a contract appointment obtained through fraudulent means, holding such illegal appointments void ab initio and not conferring any right to continue in service.

administrative petition_allowed Significant illegal appointment contractual employment outsourcing agency fraudulent appointment

Punjab and Sind Bank v. Joginder Singh

22 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3858

The High Court allowed the petition to reopen the petitioner's right to lead evidence in a civil suit despite prior closure due to delay and procedural lapses, directing expeditious trial continuation.

civil appeal_allowed Article 227 of Constitution of India closure of evidence process fee summoning record

Sheikh Abeddin v. Iqbal Ahmed & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3859
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld concurrent findings that the appellant was a caretaker licensee and dismissed the second appeal challenging eviction based on admissions in a police complaint and FIR under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC admission in FIR licensee and caretaker concurrent findings of fact

Pankaj Choudhary v. Union Public Service Commission

22 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3894-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld UPSC's strict deadline for submission of the IFS Mains Detailed Application Form, dismissing the petitioner's plea for extension despite medical and connectivity issues.

administrative petition_dismissed UPSC Detailed Application Form Indian Forest Services examination timelines

Budhu (Now Deceased) Thr LRs v. Nathu (Now Deceased) Thr LRs and Ors

22 Sep 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:3903

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' writ challenging Bhumidari rights and possession orders, holding that the matter is settled by final orders under the Delhi Land Reforms Act and the writ petition is an abuse of process.

property petition_dismissed Significant Bhumidari rights Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 writ jurisdiction Article 226

Narender Kumar Bhalla v. Indian Council of Medical Research

22 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3912-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order rejecting pension re-fixation for lack of specific challenge to pay fixation, permitting amendment and remanding the matter for merits adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pension fixation pay fixation continuing cause of action condonation of delay

Union Public Service Commission v. Nitish Kumar

22 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3910-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the UPSC's compliance with the Tribunal order reinstating the candidate's candidature despite trivial errors but dismissed the petition as the candidate was not selected on merit.

administrative petition_dismissed candidature cancellation inadvertent errors Civil Services Examination Union Public Service Commission

Ramesh Kohli v. Ravi Sawhney and Ors.

22 Sep 2022 · Najmi Waziri; Vikas Mahajan · 2022:DHC:3935-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution order directing sale of co-owned properties as per arbitration award shares, dismissing the appellant's claim to retain possession without depositing others' shares.

civil appeal_dismissed arbitration award execution of award partition of property co-ownership

Nikhil Kumar Jain v. Air India Limited

22 Sep 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4161-DB

The Delhi High Court held that entitlement to free air passages under Air India’s regulations is limited to retirement upon superannuation and does not extend to resignation, including technical resignation, dismissing the appellant’s claim.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Air India Employees’ Passage Regulations, 2017 technical resignation retirement vs resignation post-retirement benefits

Central Tyres v. Commissioner Value Added Tax & Anr.

22 Sep 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4178-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed tax recovery proceedings against a petitioner who did not file a statutory appeal but was bound by a common legal issue decided in favor of similarly situated assessees.

tax petition_allowed Significant Value Added Tax Review Application Statutory Appeal Recovery Proceedings