Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

The Animal Friends v. Delhi Development Authority

21 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3810

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal under Article 227, granting one final opportunity to lead evidence despite prior closure due to delay and pandemic-related disruptions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 of Constitution of India right to lead evidence discretion of court delay in civil proceedings

Rahul Dhaka Vikas Society Regd. v. Delhi Development Authority

21 Sep 2022 · Vikas Mahajan · 2022:DHC:3789

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to use DDA land for Ramleela, holding that ongoing construction and contractual obligations preclude such use and no vested right arises from past permissions.

administrative petition_dismissed Delhi Development Authority public land use religious functions Ramleela

Vir Chandra Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

21 Sep 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4200
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused under Sections 20, 25, and 29 of the NDPS Act, holding that the bar under Section 37 applies and the petitioner’s role as mastermind with supporting evidence precludes bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed NDPS Act Section 29 NDPS Section 37 NDPS bail

Col Vivek Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.

21 Sep 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:3790-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging military posting orders, directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation through proper channel for administrative decision.

administrative petition_dismissed posting orders representation proper channel judicial interference

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL -02 v. SHRI KRISHAN LAL MADHOK

21 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:3802-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions for undisclosed income already declared and taxed in one assessment year, ruling that taxing the same income twice across assessment years with the same tax rate amounts to impermissible double taxation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 69 Undisclosed income Assessment year

M/S AH ASSOCIATES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORT AND GENERAL), NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, NEW DELHI & ANR

21 Sep 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4154-DB

The Delhi High Court held that suspension of a customs broker license must follow due process under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018, and in absence of a specific suspension order for Delhi Commissionerate, the petitioner cannot be prevented from operating there.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Broker License Suspension Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 Regulation 16

Dr. Geeta Sharma v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

21 Sep 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3827-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's adjournment order, allowed respondents to place additional documents on record, and directed expeditious disposal of the Original Application.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal adjournment additional documents writ petition

Western Digital Technologies Inc. v. Raaj Computer

21 Sep 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:3771

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Western Digital against a defendant selling tampered and counterfeit hard-disk drives bearing its registered trademarks, affirming that tampering voids exhaustion rights under the Trade Marks Act.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off tampering counterfeit goods

MS DREAMS LINGERIE PRODUCTS v. AKASH CHAWDHARY

21 Sep 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:3772

The Delhi High Court upheld an injunction restraining the defendant, a former distributor, from using a deceptively similar trademark 'DREAM COMFORT' to the plaintiff's 'DREAMS LINGERIE', rejecting claims of suppression and genericness.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement deceptive similarity ad-interim injunction distributorship agreement

Sunny Bansal v. Saroj Devi Shehrawat

21 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3817

The Delhi High Court held that a judgment debtor cannot unilaterally adjust amounts allegedly owed by the decree holder against decretal mesne profits during execution proceedings unless expressly provided by the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 2 CPC Order XXI Rule 58 CPC Section 47 CPC execution proceedings

Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani & Anr.

21 Sep 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:3773

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction against the defendant's use of 'VASUNDHRA FASHION', holding that exclusive rights over a device mark do not extend to the common word 'VASUNDHRA' and that the marks and goods are sufficiently distinct to avoid confusion.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 device mark word mark passing off

Rajesh Giri v. Subhash Mittal & Ors.

21 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:3816
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a decree on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that no clear admissions existed and triable issues, including locus standi, precluded summary judgment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admissions issue estoppel locus standi

Dr. Amitabha Sen v. M/S. Sportsworld International Limited & Ors.

21 Sep 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:3780

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Dr. Amitabha Sen, upholding the trial court's rejection of his claim for unpaid professional fees and damages due to lack of evidence and absence of privity of contract.

civil appeal_dismissed professional fees invoice privity of contract defamation

Zelos Developers Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 25(1)

21 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:3801-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order and notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2016-17 due to incomplete consideration of taxpayer's submissions and remanded the matter for fresh decision.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) Section 133(6)

Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel Association (India) v. Airports Authority of India

21 Sep 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:3783

The Delhi High Court held that a temporary deferment of employee perks due to Covid-19 financial difficulties does not warrant payment of interest when arrears are paid within a reasonable period.

labor petition_dismissed Significant salary deferment employee perks interest on delayed payment Covid-19 financial impact

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. Intelsat Corporation

21 Sep 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:3803-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals holding that amounts received by Intelsat Corporation for leasing satellite transponder facilities do not constitute taxable royalty income under Indian tax law and the India-USA DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant royalty Income Tax Act 1961 Section 9(1)(vi) DTAA

Union of India v. J. K. Gohri

21 Sep 2022 · The Chief Justice; Subramonium Prasad; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2022:DHC:3758-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order granting pay scale parity to DRDO employees based on a set-aside Bangalore Bench decision, upholding the validity of classification and pay scale revisions under the DRDO Recruitment Rules, 1995.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant DRDO Technical Cadre Recruitment Rules 1995 Classification based on qualifications Pay scale revision Retrospective application

Yogender Sharma v. Gulab Sharma @ Gulab Nai and Ors.

21 Sep 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:3806

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the trial court's dismissal of a counterclaim under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for recovery of possession due to lack of proof of forcible dispossession.

civil petition_dismissed Section 6 Specific Relief Act forcible dispossession possession recovery summary proceeding

SMT. ASHTHA NARANG @ ASHTHAARORA v. GAURAV BHASIN

21 Sep 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:3854
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld summons issued under Section 211 IPC for false charge, holding that filing a complaint with intent to injure before a competent authority can constitute institution of criminal proceedings, and quashing powers under Section 482 CrPC should be sparingly exercised.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 211 IPC False charge Criminal proceedings Section 482 CrPC

Roots Production Private Limited v. Aarti Malhotra

21 Sep 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:3855

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's order setting aside conviction under Section 138 NI Act due to absence of legally enforceable debt and dismissed the petitioner's revision for enhancement of sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Legally enforceable debt Burden of proof