Delhi High Court

95,375 judgments

Year:

Murli Dhar v. M/S Apsara Biscuits Company

16 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4929

The Delhi High Court directed the Labour Court to grant the petitioner two more opportunities to lead evidence based on an existing affidavit while upholding the dismissal of a separate application to take additional documents on record.

labor other Labour Court evidence affidavit Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC

Federation of Ayush Drugs Manufacturers v. Union of India

16 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4927-DB

The Delhi High Court held that framing preferential procurement policies for MSMEs under the MSMED Act is a policy matter exclusively for the Government and declined to direct policy formulation, disposing the petition as a representation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant MSMED Act Section 11 Public Procurement Policy MSMEs

Rosenbauer International AG v. Airports Authority of India & Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4926-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Airports Authority of India's tender condition prescribing BS-IV emission norms for specialized airport firefighting vehicles, dismissing the petition as barred by res judicata and consistent with statutory and administrative provisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Vehicles Airfield Crash Fire Tenders Emission norms Bharat Stage IV

Kana Ram Meena v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4885-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of SC/ST reservation claim on the ground that the petitioner was not an ordinarily resident of Delhi as required by the vacancy notice.

administrative petition_dismissed SC/ST reservation ordinary residence Delhi High Court recruitment vacancy notice conditions

Sadhana Saini v. State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Nov 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:5193

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of forgery and fabrication of property documents due to strong forensic evidence and necessity of custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. forgery fabrication of documents

Vidisha Singhal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29(1) Delhi & Ors

16 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4922-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside erroneous income tax notices and order, directing issuance of amended notice with correct details and fresh adjudication in compliance with statutory procedure.

tax petition_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Section 148

M/S Nagrath Paints P. Ltd. v. Respondent

16 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:4946

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve M/s Nagrath Paints Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, concluding the winding-up process after asset realization and creditor payments.

corporate appeal_allowed Company liquidation Section 481 Companies Act 1956 Official Liquidator discharge Winding-up proceedings

M/S Thermax Ltd v. Facilitation Council & Anr

16 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5314-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the MSMED Act applies only if the supplier is registered at the time of supply, setting aside arbitration initiated by the Facilitation Council for supplies made prior to registration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 MSMED Act registration Facilitation Council jurisdiction retrospective application

DR POONAM GAUR v. STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING

16 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4997-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Tribunal to consider the petitioner's claim for upgradation of ACRs for both 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 on merit, rejecting the Tribunal's limited consideration based solely on medical evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed Annual Confidential Report ACR upgradation Tribunal jurisdiction Medical certificate

Rajinder Singh & Anr v. Balvinder Singh & Ors

16 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4919

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award, upholding the compensation granted to the claimants.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 appellate interference

Delhi Jal Board v. Its Workmen (Sri Prem Ram)

16 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4914
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award granting the workman the higher pay scale, holding that the High Court cannot interfere with factual findings absent jurisdictional error or manifest illegality.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ petition pay scale Labour Court award

M/S GM MODULAR PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S SYSKA LED LIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED

16 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5089-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a design infringement suit, holding that prior use of the design as a trademark constituted prior publication barring design registration.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Designs Act, 2000 prior publication design registration trademark use

Vikram Bakshi v. Sonia Khosla & Another

16 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2022:DHC:5185

The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving shareholding and directorship of a company with allegations of forgery and exclusive jurisdiction of the NCLT are non-arbitrable and dismissed the petition seeking reconstitution of the arbitral tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitrability shareholding dispute directorship dispute National Company Law Tribunal

Rajesh Pandian v. Director General Coast Guard Headquarters & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:4913-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Coast Guard authorities to decide and communicate the petitioner's pending resignation requests within six weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.

administrative petition_allowed resignation administrative delay judicial intervention reasonable time

Surpreet Singh Suri v. Horizon Crest India Real Estate & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2022:DHC:4887

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award on limitation grounds, holding that the limitation period runs from the date of the award and not from subsequent correction orders.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 33 Limitation

Suresh Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5362-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Settlement Commission must remit cases to the Central Excise Officer for adjudication if full and true disclosure is not made, and cannot adjudicate on merits beyond its jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Commission full and true disclosure Central Excise Act 1944 Section 32E

JK Cotton Ltd v. Tushar Khanna

16 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4902

The Delhi High Court upheld the recall of an ex parte judgment due to improper service of summons at an incorrect address and affirmed the limited scope of Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant service of summons Order IX Rule 13 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India ex parte judgment

Vintage Distillers Limited v. Ramesh Chand Parekh

16 Nov 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4894

Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over a trademark infringement suit based on credible apprehension of sales, affirmed exclusive rights in the registered label mark including essential features, and dismissed defendant's plea for return of plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off temporary injunction territorial jurisdiction

Kusum Devi v. Union of India

16 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5086
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for a train accident death, holding that the claimant failed to prove bona fide passenger status and occurrence of an untoward incident.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 bona fide passenger untoward incident loss of journey ticket

Union of India v. Kallan Singh & Anr.

16 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4890
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to the claimants for death caused by falling from a moving train, holding that absence of a ticket does not negate bona fide passenger status.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 compensation claim bona fide passenger absence of ticket