Delhi High Court

95,375 judgments

Year:

NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY v. GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD & ORS

17 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4935

The Delhi High Court dismissed Nokia's application for interim deposit of FRAND royalties by Oppo under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC, holding that no clear admission of liability was established and that complex SEP issues require full adjudication.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Standard Essential Patents FRAND Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC Section 151 CPC

National Financial Reporting Authority v. Akeel Master

17 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order allowing NFRA to continue proceedings but restraining enforcement or publication of any orders without prior court approval, preserving parties' rights pending final adjudication.

administrative appeal_dismissed interim order status quo show cause notice regulatory authority

Ajay Gupta (HUF) v. Income Tax Officer

17 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:5076-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that reassessment is justified where credible information indicates escapement of income through accommodation entries.

tax petition_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Reassessment proceedings

Sanjay Sharma v. Government of Punjab and Ors.

17 Nov 2022 · Rekha Palli · W.P.(C) 3137/2019

The Delhi High Court held that pension and terminal benefits cannot be withheld indefinitely without initiated proceedings and directed release of dues to a retired employee despite pending audit objections.

administrative petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate pension terminal benefits Punjab Civil Service Rules

Ravinder Kumar Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 20(3) New Delhi

17 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:5074-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a company restored under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act is deemed never struck off, validating income tax notices issued during the struck off period and dismissing the director's challenge as lacking locus and merit.

tax petition_dismissed Significant restoration of company struck off company Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 252 Companies Act

Sachin and Others v. Union of India and Others

17 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4939-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Medical Education Regulation limiting MBBS first professional exam attempts to four, dismissing students' plea for additional attempts and retrospective protection.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Regulations on Graduate Medical Education Medical Council of India National Medical Commission Act, 2019 Article 14

Navjeet Harjinder Gadhoke v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4950-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the sanction for the Indian Racing League, holding that internal managerial disputes do not justify judicial interference in a sporting event duly authorized by competent authorities.

administrative appeal_dismissed Letters Patent Act Indian Racing League Federation of Motor Sports Club of India managerial dispute

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 v. SURYA FRESH FOODS PVT. LTD.

17 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court held that additions under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be made in respect of completed assessments without incriminating material found during search, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material completed assessment search and seizure

National Insurance Company Ltd v. Meena Devi and Ors.

17 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:4951

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by recognizing the deceased's father and siblings as dependents, applying future prospects addition, and adjusting personal expense deductions in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency motor accident claim dependency definition future prospects

Rahul Jain v. Atul Jain

17 Nov 2022 · Prateek Jalan · 2022:DHC:4898

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 11 petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to improper invocation of arbitration and suppression of material facts regarding a family settlement dispute.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Section 21 invocation Family settlement

NEXTHERMAL CORPORATION & ANR v. CHETAN DHIMAN

17 Nov 2022 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:5205

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off of the plaintiffs' registered 'NEXTHERMAL' mark, proceeding ex parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendant's non-appearance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC trademark infringement passing off deceptive similarity

Nipun Goomer v. Sangeeta Goomer & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:4933

The Delhi High Court held that a vague restriction in a Will preventing sale of property until a beneficiary is settled in married life is void, and granted a preliminary decree of partition in favor of the plaintiff for his rightful share.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit Will construction Indian Succession Act 1925 Section 87

NTPC Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II and Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5081

The Delhi High Court set aside the provident fund authorities' orders holding NTPC liable as principal employer, affirming that the claimant was an employee of BTPS Club and not NTPC, thus NTPC is not liable for provident fund dues.

labor petition_allowed Significant Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 principal employer liability employer-employee relationship industrial dispute

Kapil Goel v. Ram Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai

16 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4923-DB

The Delhi High Court held that where both parties refuse pre-institution mediation resulting in a Non-starter Report, the plaintiff's initiation of mediation satisfies the mandatory requirement under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, allowing the suit to proceed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Pre-Institution Mediation Non-starter Report Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC

Ghansham Yashwant Dupate v. PEC Limited

16 Nov 2022 · Rekha Palli · Citation No. 2022/DHC/004917

The Delhi High Court held that terminal benefits of a superannuated employee cannot be withheld merely due to pending criminal proceedings without conviction, directing their release with interest, while adjourning pension claims pending challenge to the relevant scheme clause.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant terminal benefits superannuation withholding benefits criminal proceedings

Vidhur Bhardwaj v. Horizon Crest India Real Estate & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2022:DHC:4886

The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award is barred by limitation if filed beyond three months from receipt of the award or disposal of a timely Section 33 application, and an incompetent Section 33 application does not extend limitation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 33 application Section 34 petition Limitation period

Vinita Verma v. Virender Katarmal & Anr

16 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · CS (OS) No.3409/2014

The court held that rival claimants can be impleaded as legal representatives of a deceased party for suit continuation, but disputes over Wills and estate shares must be resolved separately, directing procedural adjustments to ensure smooth trial conduct.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 5 CPC legal representatives partition suit Will validity

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Starwood Hotel and Resorts Worldwide Inc.

16 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4924-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that payments for centralized services do not constitute taxable 'Fee for Technical Services' under the Income Tax Act or Indo-US DTAA, following binding precedent in Sheraton International Inc.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Fee for Technical Services Income Tax Act 1961 Indo-US DTAA Centralized Services

Rakesh Rana & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

16 Nov 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4952

Delhi High Court upheld rejection of alternative plot allotment to petitioners owning property in village abadi and lal dora, affirming eligibility criteria under the 1961 Scheme for land acquisition rehabilitation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Large Scale Acquisition Development & Disposal of Land in Delhi Scheme, 1961 alternative plot allotment land acquisition eligibility criteria

Skipper Properties Private Limited & Anr. v. Sunrise Property Developers Private Limited & Ors.

16 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4925-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's part decree holding the appellant company and its director jointly liable to refund security deposit with interest, affirming that clear admissions in pleadings are binding and directors can be personally liable under express contractual provisions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease agreement security deposit interest joint and several liability