Delhi High Court
29,474 judgments
Plasmagen Biosciences Private Limited v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a tender, holding that courts should not interfere with technical tender decisions absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
Sanjeev Dhundia v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the denial of promotion of a CRPF officer due to non-compliance with court orders expunging adverse remarks and directed his promotion to Inspector General rank.
Amit Kumar Agarwal and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under the National Medical Commission Act, 2019, only medical practitioners or professionals have the statutory right to appeal orders of the Ethics and Medical Registration Board, and complainants do not have such a right.
M/S Safety Energy Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Shri Gopi Ram
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory deposit of 20% compensation under Section 148 NI Act as a condition for entertaining appeal against Section 138 conviction and dismissed the petition challenging bail cancellation for non-compliance.
SPS Enerpros (India) Private Limited v. Chetak Enterprises Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the Delhi courts lacked territorial jurisdiction over a recovery suit where no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi and the substantive defendants were located outside Delhi.
Union of India & Anr. v. Shri Harinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's order directing regularisation of outsourced daily wage cleaners based on inapplicable Supreme Court precedents and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Sarabjeet Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Imran & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of a genuine settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjay & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' genuine and voluntary settlement and mutual divorce.
Rimi Khanuja v. S.P. Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree passed on clear admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC in a landlord-tenant dispute where the tenant admitted tenancy, rent, and valid termination notice.
Sahil Kumar @ Kashi v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a neighborly dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Harpreet Singh Sethi v. State
The Delhi High Court directed that in a matrimonial dispute case under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, arrest of the petitioner can only be effected after giving a 10-day notice if the petitioner cooperates with the investigation.
Vodafone Mauritius Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle International-Tax 3(1)(1), Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court remitted reassessment proceedings against Vodafone Mauritius to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of jurisdiction and DTAA benefits after hearing the petitioner.
World Phone Internet Services Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking regulation of OTT internet telephony services, directing TRAI to conduct stakeholder consultations and reconsider the regulatory framework before any enforcement action.
Empire Trading Company v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29(1)
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax notices and order issued against a dissolved partnership firm for failure to furnish material to the ex-partners and directed the assessing officer to provide material and an opportunity of hearing before proceeding.
Ganga Ram Sharma v. Mukesh Kumar
The High Court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek recall of Non-Bailable Warrant and process under Section 82 CrPC in view of a settlement, keeping coercive process in abeyance pending trial court's decision.
Anil Malhotra v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court held that withholding pension under Regulation 33 without notice and hearing violates natural justice and quashed the impugned order, directing a fresh decision after affording opportunity to the petitioner.
Sanjeev Kumar & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under matrimonial dispute offences based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.
Jyoti Trivedi & Anr. v. Central Information Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced the penalty imposed on an officiating CPIO for delay in furnishing RTI information due to claimed technical malfunction but upheld the CIC’s directions for disclosure.
Rohini Chopra v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a District Magistrate's order must be reasoned and directed issuance of a detailed order before eviction, while staying eviction pending appeal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.